On Tuesday 26 July 2011 22:35:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Since you beat me to it, that makes me the 10nd :)
"Time for bed," said Zebedi.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter number 5290
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:03:57 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I see only 11 possibilities -- that's a binary three. (Thanks to Neil
> > for that clever idea.)
>
> I'm sure Neil would be the first to disclaim originality in that idea.
Since you beat me to it, that makes me the 10nd :)
--
Nei
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 00:02:26 walt wrote:
> I see only 11 possibilities -- that's a binary three. (Thanks to Neil for
> that clever idea.)
I'm sure Neil would be the first to disclaim originality in that idea.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter number 5290
On 07/26/11 01:02, walt wrote:
> Hm. Does the second machine have an EFI BIOS too?
No, "regular", old-style, bios.
> Hm again. I see only 11 possibilities -- that's a binary three. (Thanks
> to Neil for that clever idea.)
:-)
> 1) You failed to notice those same errors the first time you boo
On 07/25/2011 06:44 AM, pk wrote:
> On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
>
>> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
>> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
>> one from the live cd?
>
> ...I did redo the usb stick but it refuses to boot
On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
> one from the live cd?
No, I'm saying that the usb ports on the motherboard seems dead in my
now brand new Gentoo insta
On 07/25/2011 03:44 AM, pk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just put together a new computer composed of an Asus motherboard (AMD
> 990FX chipset, "Sabertooth" model, i.e. this one:
> http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_AM3Plus/SABERTOOTH_990FX/).
> Initially, the onboard usb devices worked fine in AMD64 Gent
7 matches
Mail list logo
