Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MD5SUM

2014-03-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:05:33 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: > nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct... > Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS. > So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL > md5sums are incorrect but the file

Re:[gentoo-user] Re: MD5SUM

2014-03-13 Thread Guido Budack
nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct... Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS. So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL md5sums are incorrect but the file-sizes aren't. In that case either the media is corrupted or my

[gentoo-user] Re: MD5SUM

2014-03-13 Thread eroen
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:49:51 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: > md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso > And now, any suggestion? > You don't specifically state what you are after, but I'll mention some stuff anyway. The gentoo livedvds are mostly meant as a showcase of gentoo's capabilities. Wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: md5sum for directories?

2008-02-26 Thread Mick
On Sunday 24 February 2008, »Q« wrote: > Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm thinking of something like md5sum for directories. > > I think you may have gotten better solutions for your situation, but > md5deep (in portage) is like md5sum but with directory recursion. I'm probably not sugg

[gentoo-user] Re: md5sum for directories?

2008-02-24 Thread »Q«
Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking of something like md5sum for directories. I think you may have gotten better solutions for your situation, but md5deep (in portage) is like md5sum but with directory recursion. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list