Message-
From: Dale
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:53:35
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kde-meta
Francesco Talamona wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I am trying to emerge kde-met
06:40:10
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kde-meta
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
> message
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> Traceback (
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
> message
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 43, in
> retval = emerge_main(
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
> message
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 43, in
> retval = emerge_main()
> File "/usr/lib64/portage
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
>> of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
>> emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
>>
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
> Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
> of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
> emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
> what I am reading that we the us
james wrote:
> Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta,
>> emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do "emerge --list-sets" to see
>> which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in
>> /var/lib/portage/world the sets
Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes:
> Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta,
> emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do "emerge --list-sets" to see
> which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in
> /var/lib/portage/world the sets will be listed in
> /var/
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:29 PM, James wrote:
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
>
> Volker and Alan,
>
>> Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly
>> hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better
>> than monolithic, but sets are just
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
Volker and Alan,
> Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly
> hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better
> than monolithic, but sets are just so much cleaner than -meta. Plus you get
> to easily
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> > > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
> > >
> > > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
> >
> > just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
>
> Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
> > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
> just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have many different
users asking for many different things, und
On 02/06/06, Thomas Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* On Jun 2 20:21, Mick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> What's the best way to find out what -meta packages exist
eix 'kde.*-meta'
> and what they contain?
The KDE website is pretty good for that - see here:
http://kde.org/whatisk
* On Jun 2 20:21, Mick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
> What's the best way to find out what -meta packages exist
eix 'kde.*-meta'
> and what they contain?
The KDE website is pretty good for that - see here:
http://kde.org/whatiskde/project.php#distribution
Tom
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.or
14 matches
Mail list logo
