How about a crazier idea:
Each package has a stability rating from 0-99 per
architecture.
0 means totally untested/unstable and 99 means rock
solid/no bugs. (0-33~unstable, 34-66~testing,
67-99~stable)
Each new package starts at 50. Whenever a user uses
the package, he can then vote on it by givi
On 29 March 2006 18:12, Schleimer, Ben wrote:
> > Isn't the solution to have 3 levels: 'testing',
> > 'probation' & 'stable' ?
> > 'Testing' would be literally that, asking for
> > feedback from users;
> > 'probation' wb already tested for a defined period
> > -- say 30 days --
>
> How about a
> Isn't the solution to have 3 levels: 'testing',
> 'probation' & 'stable' ?
> 'Testing' would be literally that, asking for
> feedback from users;
> 'probation' wb already tested for a defined period
> -- say 30 days --
How about a crazier idea:
Each package has a stability rating from 0-99
Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 21:30 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Isn't the solution to have 3 levels: 'testing', 'probation' & 'stable' ?
>
> There are 3 levels:
>
> Masked, ~ARCH, and ARCH.
>
> Masked you can install if you want, like gnome-2.14, but it's your own
> fault if it
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 21:30 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> Isn't the solution to have 3 levels: 'testing', 'probation' & 'stable' ?
There are 3 levels:
Masked, ~ARCH, and ARCH.
Masked you can install if you want, like gnome-2.14, but it's your own
fault if it kills your system.
~ARCH you can
060324 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> KDE 3.4.3 has its bugs too.. a lot of them fixed in the 3.5 releases.
> 3.5.1 is not in stable, and 3.5.2 is already looming around the corner
Isn't the solution to have 3 levels: 'testing', 'probation' & 'stable' ?
'Testing' would be literally that, ask
On Thursday 23 March 2006 18:22, Christopher O'Neill wrote:
> I've been using 3.5.1 for a while also, imo it should stay in unstable
> for now. There are a few bugs with the desktop, Konqueror and
> Kaffeine also has a habit of seg-faulting. I am considering
> rebuilding it with the debug flags t
On Thursday 23 March 2006 11:22, "Christopher O'Neill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] Re: KDE version':
> I've been using 3.5.1 for a while also, imo it should stay in unstable
> for now. There are a few bugs with the desktop, Konque
Christopher O'Neill wrote:
>I've been using 3.5.1 for a while also, imo it should stay in unstable
>for now. There are a few bugs with the desktop, Konqueror and
>Kaffeine also has a habit of seg-faulting. I am considering
>rebuilding it with the debug flags to I can submit some useful bug
>repo
I've been using 3.5.1 for a while also, imo it should stay in unstable
for now. There are a few bugs with the desktop, Konqueror and
Kaffeine also has a habit of seg-faulting. I am considering
rebuilding it with the debug flags to I can submit some useful bug
reports.
I think packages in stable
10 matches
Mail list logo
