Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-29 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
James wrote: >Alexander Puchmayr linznet.at> writes: > > >> How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? >> I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t >processes >> occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB >defined. > >iotop (in portage) ma

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-27 Thread James
Alexander Puchmayr linznet.at> writes: > How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? > I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes > occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. iotop (in portage) may help? There is an

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 26/12/13 21:13, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: Hi there, How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. KDE's "System Activity" (KSysGuard)