[gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Michael Higgins writes: > On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:52:30 -0600 > Harry Putnam wrote: > >> >> Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry >> >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223. object >> >> version 1.609 does not match $::VERSION %_ >> >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-04 Thread Michael Higgins
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:52:30 -0600 Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223. object > >> version 1.609 does not match $::VERSION %_ > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223. BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:52:30 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > Have you had a similar problem and `perl-cleaner' fixed it? Any perl has modules problems after updating perl itself, you should run perl-cleaner. Or don't wait for the problem and just run it after any major version upgrade of perl. --

[gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here

2010-03-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Willie Wong writes: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:21:35AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> >>> Unpacking source... >> >>> Unpacking DBD-mysql-4.013.tar.gz to >> >>> /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work >> >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.01.3/work >> >>> Co