Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > properly; now all I need to do is make grub use the plain old 80x25
>
> Thanks, but I'm using a manually written grub.cfg
Then it is completely trivial: Just do *not* insert code
which sets graphics like insmod {vga,vbe,gfxterm},
loadfont unicode, terminal_output gfxter
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > PS, your not alone is frustration and less than ideal (er_shit)
> > configuration experiences.
> There was some frustration when grub2 would complain when I tried to
> install it in a partition boot record, rather than the MBR that
> *buntu wanted.
The handboo
On Saturday 25 Jan 2014 19:32:16 James wrote:
> What we need is some "dumbed_down" documents for the over 50 crowd,
> because, like you, I'm tired of fixing things that were solved,
> decades ago.
:-))
> Closely intertwined with grub2 issues are UUIDs, (U)EFI, fstab stratigies,
> gpt formating
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps I'm getting older or just bored with change, but is there an
> alternative to grub2 that has the simplicity of grub-legacy, for more
> complex than your average Ubuntu-like user requirements?
>From my research, nothing that is gaining ground. Grub2 is bein
On Saturday 25 Jan 2014 13:51:01 Martin Vaeth wrote:
> An example for a manual setup (i.e. not autogenerating grub.cfg)
> using this technique can be found here:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7426932.html#7426932
Good $(DEITY)! I'd have to enlarge my boot partition to cram all that in!
Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Now, my question is how to have grub2 offer me a choice of kernels from all
> those that are present in /boot (a separate ext2 partition). Not only that,
> but pass different softlevel selectors to them.
In my opinion you should decide for either manually writing a grub.
6 matches
Mail list logo