Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> I got fed up dealing with Firefox addons, so took the alternate route I
> used about every 6 months or so:
>
> emerge -et world
>
> and everything is nice and stable now after 48 hours running. I actually
> suspect an intel driver/mesa problem as I would often also get visu
Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:39:04 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
>> Kai Krakow wrote:
>>> Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:08:39 -0500
>>> schrieb Dale :
>>>
Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
I tried it on one profile I have and it was not good. It slowed
Am Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:39:04 -0500
schrieb Dale :
> Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:08:39 -0500
> > schrieb Dale :
> >
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> >> I tried it on one profile I have and it was not good. It slowed
> >> Firefox to a crawl. It too
Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:08:39 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 14:59:48 Dale wrote:
>>>
Ublock is another option as well. I use it on some Firefox
profiles. It does seem to respond better than Adblock but some
things I
On 21/03/2017 21:50, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:35:36 +0200
> schrieb Alan McKinnon :
>
>> This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
>>
>> I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely nowhere. So I
>> conclude all my thoughts and assumptions are wrong and not w
Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:08:39 -0500
schrieb Dale :
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 14:59:48 Dale wrote:
> >
> >> Ublock is another option as well. I use it on some Firefox
> >> profiles. It does seem to respond better than Adblock but some
> >> things I don't like about Ublock
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 14:59:48 Dale wrote:
>
>> Ublock is another option as well. I use it on some Firefox profiles.
>> It does seem to respond better than Adblock but some things I don't like
>> about Ublock.
>>
>> I may look into that Ghostery too. See if it is availabl
On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 14:59:48 Dale wrote:
> Ublock is another option as well. I use it on some Firefox profiles.
> It does seem to respond better than Adblock but some things I don't like
> about Ublock.
>
> I may look into that Ghostery too. See if it is available for Firefox
> and Seamonkey
On Wednesday 22 Mar 2017 23:48:06 Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:12:36 +
> schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> > You have me thinking now. I have a couple of spare 1TB SSDs here, and
> > my workstation is a 12-core i7 running on a 256GB NVMe drive with 32
> > GB RAM.
> >
> > Maybe I should
Am Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:12:36 +
schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 22:50:04 Kai Krakow wrote:
>
> ---<8
>
> > I'm combining this with bcache. That's a cache between kernel and
> > filesystem that you put on SSD. Apparently, it requires
> > repartitioning to map your filesystem
On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 22:50:04 Kai Krakow wrote:
---<8
> I'm combining this with bcache. That's a cache between kernel and
> filesystem that you put on SSD. Apparently, it requires repartitioning
> to map your filesystem through bcache (it has to add a protective
> superblock in front of your FS
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:50:04 +0100
schrieb Kai Krakow :
[...]
> BTW: Laptop disks are really slow usually because most manufacturers
> only build them with 5400 RPM disks. Maybe get a hybrid disk instead
> if you only have one slot. I think, Seagate still makes those. It
> should have similar bene
On Tuesday 21 Mar 2017 22:50:04 Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:22:48 +0200
>
> schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> > On 21/03/2017 22:16, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > > Test one by one... Either disable all, then enable one by one, or
> > > vice-versa.
> > >
> > > Chances are that your FS may be block
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:22:48 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> On 21/03/2017 22:16, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Test one by one... Either disable all, then enable one by one, or
> > vice-versa.
> >
> > Chances are that your FS may be blocking on sync. Do you maybe have
> > a very high value in /proc/sys/v
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:14:16 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> On 21/03/2017 22:25, Kai Krakow wrote:
> [...]
> >> Good idea. For posterity so's I don;t forget:
> >>
> >> - gentoo home page
> >> - one or more readthedocs sites (especially docs.ansible.com)
> >> - 1 or more jira pages (work stuff)
On 21/03/2017 22:16, Kai Krakow wrote:
Test one by one... Either disable all, then enable one by one, or
vice-versa.
Chances are that your FS may be blocking on sync. Do you maybe have a
very high value in /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_{ratio,bytes}?
If ratio is 0, then bytes is used. Ratio is
On 21/03/2017 22:25, Kai Krakow wrote:
I see this with some websites that do some weird stuff.
CPU for at least one core then also goes to 100รท.
Make a list of websites open in tabs when it happens to see if
there are common ones that are always there when you have the
issue.
Good idea. For post
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:11:58 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> On 21/03/2017 22:04, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On March 21, 2017 8:35:36 PM GMT+01:00, Alan McKinnon
> > wrote:
> >> This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
> >>
> >> I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely no
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:51:05 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> On 21/03/2017 21:50, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:35:36 +0200
> > schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> >
> >> This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
> >>
> >> I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely now
Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:35:36 +0200
> schrieb Alan McKinnon :
>
>> This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
>>
>> I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely nowhere. So I
>> conclude all my thoughts and assumptions are wrong and not worth even
>> sharing
On 21/03/2017 21:50, Kai Krakow wrote:
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:35:36 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely nowhere. So I
conclude all my thoughts and assumptions are wrong and not worth even
shari
Am Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:35:36 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> This post is rather vague, sorry about that in advance.
>
> I've spent much time on this and gotten absolutely nowhere. So I
> conclude all my thoughts and assumptions are wrong and not worth even
> sharing (on account of them being s
22 matches
Mail list logo
