On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, James wrote:
>
> And finally, I think that alll init systems are going to become very
> irrelevant in the next few years, as what they provide, can be passed
> from a *personal cluster* to any and all hardware, dymanically. That's
> what the cell phones (smart phon
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot.
I think it is actually a compliment to the flexibility of Gentoo that
these derivatives are so different. Gentoo is a som
Mark David Dumlao gmail.com> writes:
> Look up. the very first post contrastd coreos' systemd as opposed
> to openrc, bringing words like "evil"ution into the park.
That refers to the concept of conglomerates vs the people.
Systemd is only mentioned in passing. If it offends you, ignore it, OK
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>
> but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot.
>
I think it is actually a compliment to the flexibility of Gentoo that
these derivatives are so different. Gentoo is a somewhat-generic
linux distro overall - in its
Look up. the very first post contrastd coreos' systemd as opposed to
openrc, bringing words like "evil"ution into the park.
later on we hear that coreos is "stealing" gentoo's ideas and hope that it
is CRUSHED.
but why? its its own frigging distro now. not gentoo by a long shot.
On Wednesday, Dec
On Wednesday, December 03, 2014 02:39:53 AM Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate
> LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list?
Why do I get the feeling you just want another flamewar?
I don't see any mention of systemd or a
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:37 PM, James wrote:
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>
>> You seem to be wanting a minimalist profile of Gentoo, not CoreOS.
>
> YES!, I want Gentoo to "CRUSH" CoreOS because we can and our goal is not
> to deceptively move users to a "rent the binary" jail. OK?
>
Gen
Why do I get the feeling that this is another episode of the "i hate
LennartSoft(tm) too" circlejerk on the gentoo mailing list?
this mailing list used to be about gentoo.
On Dec 3, 2014 1:38 AM, "James" wrote:
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
>
> > > is integration of the best of the Cor
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> > is integration of the best of the CoreOS ideas into "Gentoo proper".
>
> I'm not suggesting that "/usr types of systems" are going away. I'm
> just pointing out that they're not really the focus of CoreOS (hosting
> them inside containers is, but not runni
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM, James wrote:
>
> I do not see the "/usr" types of systems (like a current gentoo workstation
> or server) going away any time soon. What I hope WE can pull off at Gentoo
> is integration of the best of the CoreOS ideas into "Gentoo proper".
I'm not suggesting that
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> > ChromeOS is most definitely a Gentoo derivative [2,3,4], even though
> > that fact is not really well known (and not really publicised).
Thanks for the links. I did not see that bit of history...
> Interesting. Talk about a march of init systems. You h
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> > To me, it appears that some forward looking folks have forked
> > (stolen the best parts?) gentoo, made some fundamental
> > (long overdue changes) and are > > all about creating a
> > source_to_cluster platform. (h, vaguely sounds
> > familiar...scr
12 matches
Mail list logo
