[gentoo-user] Re: [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup

2011-07-11 Thread walt
On 07/11/2011 04:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > A few years ago our Queen uttered a solecism (well, it had to happen sooner > or later, and as far as I know it's the only one). A famous American politician, recently retired, has never uttered a non-solecism. Or would that be un-solecism? Anti-

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup

2011-07-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:56:42 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > > Apart from the need to access legacy data, which Harry has resolved by > > reformatting, is there any benefit in using encfs rather than the > > in-kernel ecryptfs these days? > > Are you using ecryptfs? I started looking around and t

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup

2011-07-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:35:55 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote: > >> Having said that: >> One of encfs's Achilles heel is its dependency on the boost C++ library >> which is *very* sensitive wrt to API/ABI changes and the like. It also >> depends on OpenSSL which also shares th

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT encfs] When encfs gets hungup

2011-07-09 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins writes: > On Friday, July 8 at 11:55 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: > > [..] >> Somehow I managed to really hurt the installation ... here is what I >> remember having done: >> >> Some how I got mixed up when running as root, and attempted to mount a >> users encfs directory. (Its a