On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:15:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Something is seriously wrong with your GRUB setup if it takes a day to
> > select the previous kernel :(
> >
> Nope... it's all pretty vanilla... I expect it to take a few minutes -
> but I'm not attempting it unless I've got a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
That reminds me of the time I carefully backup up everything from
partition A to partition B, and verified it, before reformatting
partition B instead of A.
You've quite a way to go to get my experience. In my 10GB was about
50mb of only-copy ASCII - the air turned blue
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:46:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've never forgiven myself for the decade's
> acquisition of 10GB of data... that I accidentally wiped thinking I was
> backing it up. It's a sinking feeling like no other.
That reminds me of the time I carefully backup up everythin
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Maybe I should upgrade to the latest kernel (I'm reluctant to do this
in a hurry - since I've lost my notes on which kernel options I'd
activated
Copy the current config over and run make oldconfig. There's no need to
take notes when the system keeps track for you
- an
well could you use wget to get the files because they have a built in
rate limiter so you can say 120K or whatever
Nick
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:21:48 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Maybe I should upgrade to the lates
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:21:48 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe I should upgrade to the latest kernel (I'm reluctant to do this
> in a hurry - since I've lost my notes on which kernel options I'd
> activated
Copy the current config over and run make oldconfig. There's no need to
take notes
Mick wrote:
I think that the problem is associated with the way that the Linux box treats
bind requests. Other than QoS which will try to allocate some bandwidth to
bind packets, or nice which will elevate bind's processes - you may want to
check your kernel's IO scheduler and set it to someth
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Let's make an experiment:
> >
> > 1. Terminate all downloads and activity on the internet.
> > 2. Restart your bind (so it flushes its cache)
> > 3. in XP1 download something huge (an ISO image) from one souce in the
>
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Nope. "fixed rate limiting" is not the answer. You need QoS at the
router level, but if it doesn't support it, you'll need to change how
your Linux box talks and listen to internet packages. That's what I
said -more or less- on my first reply.
I'm a believer in doing thing
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Ah!! But Windows (XP) uses TC by default. It doesn't use 20% of the
network bandwidth unless you tweak some registry setting and/or
disable QoS in network properties.
That sounds like a fine plan for me...
which one? remove qos from windo
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Ah!! But Windows (XP) uses TC by default. It doesn't use 20% of the
network bandwidth unless you tweak some registry setting and/or
disable QoS in network properties.
That sounds like a fine plan for me... but, erm, how does it know? Both
Linux and Xp talk to my router at
Quoting Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone else have this problem?
Yes, everyone using TCP :)
You can read Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control for more
info (http://lartc.org/).
Snappy answer... but I'm pretty sure I've never seen this before - on
a wide range of OS and network
On Sunday 17 August 2008 16:32:11 Steve wrote:
> Norberto Bensa wrote:
> >> Is there a straightforward way to make my Gentoo box 'play fair' and
> >> not hog 100% of the bandwidth?
> >
> > If your router doesn't give you bandwidth and/or traffic shaping
> > control, you can drop some packets. For e
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Is there a straightforward way to make my Gentoo box 'play fair' and
not hog 100% of the bandwidth?
If your router doesn't give you bandwidth and/or traffic shaping
control, you can drop some packets. For example, the following rule
will accept up to 50 packets per second
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a straightforward way to make my Gentoo box 'play fair' and
not hog 100% of the bandwidth?
If your router doesn't give you bandwidth and/or traffic shaping
control, you can drop some packets. For example, the following rule
will accept up to 50 packets
I've a Netgear DG834G router - and I connect two machines to it using
Ethernet... one Gentoo; one Windows... it works reasonably well...
I hit a snag when downloading a large file from Gentoo - for example a
multi-meg portage archive. At such times, the Windows PC seems to be
given a rather u
16 matches
Mail list logo
