On Friday 19 December 2008 20:53:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
> Yes, in English "must" can also mean that you infer or presume
> something.
s/presume/assume/
(Not the same meaning, in spite of popular misuse.)
--
Rgds
Peter
Hi Paul,
Paul Hartman wrote:
1 a: be commanded or requested to b: be urged to :
ought by all means to
2: be compelled by physical necessity to : be
required by immediate or future need or purpose to
3 a: be obliged to : be compelled by social considerations to b: be required by law, custo
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:13:11 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > So, instead of "your kernel must not be 64bits", maybe it
> > would have been clearer to say "I suspect you are not using a 64-bit
> > kernel; if you were, it would not have this problem". :)
>
> So can "your kernel must not..." be u
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 21:53:47 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>> Yes, in English "must" can also mean that you infer or presume
>> something.
>
> Ah, yes. I remember :-)
>
>> So, instead of "your kernel must not be 64bits", maybe it
>> would
Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 21:53:47 schrieb Paul Hartman:
> Yes, in English "must" can also mean that you infer or presume
> something.
Ah, yes. I remember :-)
> So, instead of "your kernel must not be 64bits", maybe it
> would have been clearer to say "I suspect you are not using a 64-bit
> k
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 19:24:12 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> On Freitag 19 Dezember 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>> > Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 14:03:04 schrieb Shaochun Wang:
>> > > Your kernel must not be 64bits, I think.
>>
Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 19:24:12 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Freitag 19 Dezember 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 14:03:04 schrieb Shaochun Wang:
> > > Your kernel must not be 64bits, I think.
> >
> > Why not is he not allowed to run a 64bit kernel?
> >
>
>
On Freitag 19 Dezember 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 14:03:04 schrieb Shaochun Wang:
> > Your kernel must not be 64bits, I think.
>
> Why not is he not allowed to run a 64bit kernel?
>
> Bye...
>
> Dirk
the option is not available with 64bits - maybe not needed.
Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2008 14:03:04 schrieb Shaochun Wang:
> Your kernel must not be 64bits, I think.
Why not is he not allowed to run a 64bit kernel?
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:45:58PM +0100, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> > Kernel w/o CONFIG_LBD?
>
> thanks a lot!
>
Your kernel must not be 64bits, I think.
--
Shaochun Wang
Jabber: fung...@jabber.org
Hi Dirk,
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> Kernel w/o CONFIG_LBD?
thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe
Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 18:15:11 schrieb Matthias Fechner:
> The raid should have a nice of 3TB and not 747GB.
> Has anyone an idea what is wrong here?
Kernel w/o CONFIG_LBD?
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
I created today a raid5 with three 1.5TB harddisks.
What I did:
1. created partitions on every harddisk with type 0xfd, fdisk says:
Platte /dev/sdb: 1500.3 GByte, 1500301910016 Byte
255 K?pfe, 63 Sektoren/Spuren, 182401 Zylinder
Einheiten = Zylinder von 16065 ? 512 = 8225280 Bytes
Disk identi
13 matches
Mail list logo
