On Thursday 29 Jan 2015 22:13:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 28.01.2015 um 00:28 schrieb walt:
> > Yesterday I installed 4GB more of RAM in this machine for a total of 8GB,
> > and the machine soon began random segfaulting and even a kernel crash or
> > two, so obviously I suspected the new RA
Am 28.01.2015 um 00:28 schrieb walt:
> Yesterday I installed 4GB more of RAM in this machine for a total of 8GB, and
> the machine soon began random segfaulting and even a kernel crash or two, so
> obviously I suspected the new RAM was faulty.
>
> I let memtest86+ run overnight and it found zero me
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:28:11 -0800 walt wrote:
> Yesterday I installed 4GB more of RAM in this machine for a total of 8GB, and
> the machine soon began random segfaulting and even a kernel crash or two, so
> obviously I suspected the new RAM was faulty.
>
> I let memtest86+ run overnight and it fo
On 01/27/2015 03:28 PM, walt wrote:
> My question is why didn't memtest86+ find any errors? Could it be that the
> first RAM I bought was actually okay but this machine didn't like it for some
> reason? Both were DDR3/1333MHz, just from different manufacturers.
>
If the timing/voltage is set wr
On 28/01/2015 01:28, walt wrote:
> Yesterday I installed 4GB more of RAM in this machine for a total of 8GB, and
> the machine soon began random segfaulting and even a kernel crash or two, so
> obviously I suspected the new RAM was faulty.
>
> I let memtest86+ run overnight and it found zero memor
Yesterday I installed 4GB more of RAM in this machine for a total of 8GB, and
the machine soon began random segfaulting and even a kernel crash or two, so
obviously I suspected the new RAM was faulty.
I let memtest86+ run overnight and it found zero memory errors. Today I
exchanged the new RAM any
6 matches
Mail list logo
