Hello
(Original post too long to quote)
How about building it dynamically and taking all the needed libraries as
well? I had similar problem (I needed fsck.ext3 in my init ramdisk) and
I just used ldd to find out what does it need.
You can test if it has enough by copying the thinks indo a direc
On 25 Sep 2008, at 20:02, Erik Hahn wrote:
I don't know much about servers so this might be rather stupid, but:
What about dismounting the driver and fsck'ing it in another computer?
I think the problem is that the drive (the server) is in a physically
remote location.
(from the original me
I don't know much about servers so this might be rather stupid, but:
What about dismounting the driver and fsck'ing it in another computer?
-Erik
--
hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm4l7Gi2e2t4b7Ken4/7a16s0r1p-5.62/-6.56g5OR
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:34 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
# ldd e2fsck/e2fsck
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb8033000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7edb000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb8034000)
Ehm, exactly. So yes, it uses less libraries than
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:34 +0200, Maarten wrote:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > The grep package has a "static" USE flag. e2fsprogs does not. So
> > enabling the static USE flag has no effect on e2fsprogs.
>
> Ehm, how do you figure that? It surely displays the "static" USE flag:
>
> thoughtpad ~
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Maarten schrieb am 24.09.2008 21:39:
Can anyone help with this ? Does this package not support building
static ? The USE flag is there for a reason, no? Did I take the wrong
approach here ? What is up with this [damn] package ?!?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:39 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Hi List,
[...]
# Grep works fine...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd /bin/grep
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e42000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f96000)
thoughtpad ~ #
Maarten schrieb am 24.09.2008 21:39:
Can anyone help with this ? Does this package not support building
static ? The USE flag is there for a reason, no? Did I take the wrong
approach here ? What is up with this [damn] package ?!?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232115 gives some informa
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:39 +0200, Maarten wrote:
> Hi List,
>
[...]
>
> # Grep works fine...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd /bin/grep
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e42000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f96000)
>
> thoughtpad ~ # USE="s
Hi List,
I'm in a bit of trouble. A server or ours has a broken e2fsck because it
is linked to a library version that doesn't exist anymore. Yes, I should
have fixed this before-- but alas, I obviously didn't... :-(
Tonight, the server had a hard crash and the only way to get it up again
(n
10 matches
Mail list logo
