Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon with gcc-5 without issues WAS: Palemoon again - again

2017-04-20 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 19 Apr 2017 00:51:00 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 17:04:16 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > On 170418-09:17+, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can > > > add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask > > > > "If" is

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon with gcc-5 without issues WAS: Palemoon again - again

2017-04-19 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170419-00:51+0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 17:04:16 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > On 170418-09:17+, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can > > > add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask > > > > "If" is what I woul

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon with gcc-5 without issues WAS: Palemoon again - again

2017-04-18 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 17:04:16 Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 170418-09:17+, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can > > add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask > > "If" is what I would start with. Because it's hard to believe. Possible, >

[gentoo-user] Palemoon with gcc-5 without issues WAS: Palemoon again - again

2017-04-18 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170418-09:17+, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On April 18, 2017 11:06:12 AM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey > wrote: > >On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: > >> A couple of things to note, which also apply to building Firefox ... > >I don't see any of those USE flags. This is from the oct