Joseph wrote:
>On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>>On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
>>
>>> I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
>>> First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password"
>text upon log in; now Openoffice-bin
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text upon
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
On 10/20/13 20:42, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text upon
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems
On 10/20/13 20:09, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Joseph wrote:
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text upon l
og in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:45:26AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
> First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text
> upon log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
>
> How to go about this bug?
> I have f
Joseph wrote:
>I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
>First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password"
>text upon log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
>
>How to go about this bug?
>I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
>one x86 and o
I have been hit by a bug that I don't know how to go about it.
First my login manager slim is not showing any "username / password" text upon
log in; now Openoffice-bin has no menu text on top.
How to go about this bug?
I have four systems two x86 and two amd64
one x86 and one amd64 are effecte
BRM wrote:
From: Paul Hartman
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required
>From: Paul Hartman
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
>
>On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
>> I noticed this today:
>>
>> The following mask changes are n
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick wrote:
> >>>
> All sounds good, except that libreoffice
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick wrote:
>>> All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
>>> emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
>> Is it much w
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick wrote:
> > All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
> > emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
>
> Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are n
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick wrote:
> All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and
> on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I haven't paid attention to te
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale wrote:
> > > Paul Hartman wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
> > >>> I noticed this today:
> > >>>
> > >>> The following mask cha
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale wrote:
> > Paul Hartman wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
> >>> I noticed this today:
> >>>
> >>> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
> >>> #required by @selected,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I noticed this today:
>>>
>>> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
>>> #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
>>> # /usr/portage/profiles
Yeap there is a version for windows and it works fine. :)
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal (27 Jul 2011)
# Old replaced packages. Wi
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
> I noticed this today:
>
> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
> #required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
> # /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> # Tomáš Chvátal (27 Jul 2011)
> # Old replaced packages. Will be removed
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal (27 Jul 2011)
# Old replaced packages. Will be removed in 30 days.
# app-office/openoffice -> app-office/libreoff
Mick wrote:
It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
very last minute!
It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS="-j1" but just in
case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
<< SNIP>>
Before I start again, shall I switch to libreoff
On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:27:34 Mick wrote:
> It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
> very last minute!
>
> It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS="-j1" but just
> in case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
> =
It must be one of the most annoying things in Gentoo when OOo fails at the
very last minute!
It may be this was caused by me forgetting to set MAKEOPTS="-j1" but just in
case something else is amiss, does this look familiar?
===
=
Building
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:08 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did
> opine thusly:
>
> > Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
> > > (actual file it hangs on can vary) and
Apparently, though unproven, at 06:14 on Thursday 03 February 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
> > (actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
> > build hangs.
> >
> > Anyone s
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
build hangs.
Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
I google isnt showing me any similar situations.
I am having problems building openoffice - it gets to the IDL files
(actual file it hangs on can vary) and seems to crash part of X and the
build hangs.
Anyone seen this before? - it is happening on only one of my systems and
I google isnt showing me any similar situations.
BillK
Hello,
For years now, I have used openoffice to edit word file with
tables. Now no matter what version word doc, I cannot edit
and file that end in .doc with a simple table. I can edit a .doc
file but upon reload the formatting is scrambled. I always save
them as word (.doc) XP/97 format.
It so
Hello,
Openoffice 3.0 failed so I installed version 3.1.0.
It gives this message:
QSettings: failed to open file '/usr/qt/3/etc/settings/qt_plugins_3.3rc'
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
Abiword works. However, I've had trouble with O
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged. Curiously,
> nothing changed. There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11). Am I
> missing something obvious? I'm on AMD64.
>
> OOo has been emerged with following USE flags
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 18:23:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged. Curiously,
> nothing changed. There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11). Am I
> missing something obvious? I'm on AMD64.
>
> OOo has been emerged with following USE flags:
I enabled the nsplugin USE flag in OOo 3.1.0 and re-emerged. Curiously,
nothing changed. There's no plugin listed in Firefox (3.0.11). Am I
missing something obvious? I'm on AMD64.
OOo has been emerged with following USE flags:
bash-completion dbus gtk linguas_en linguas_en_US nsplugin
Jim Cunning wrote on 08/05/09 06:49:
>>> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
>>> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
>>> layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
>>> kmail and other windows, but the
Jim Cunning schrieb:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations
On Monday 04 May 2009 18:10:50 Saphirus Sage wrote:
> Jim Cunning wrote:
> > I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> > characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
> > layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
>
Jim Cunning wrote:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations i
Jim Cunning wrote:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations i
I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
other windows, but the dead key combinations in OpenOffice are simply
de
Hi,
I emerged eselect-oodict and it acts like it's doing something but
still I don't see any dictionaries in
Tools->Options->Language Settings->Writing Aids
Under Languages I have selected English (USA)
Is there something else I have to turn on to get spell checking
working for my wife?
On Monday 01 Dec 2008, Fernando Antunes wrote:
> 2008/12/1 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Any ideas how to fix?
> >
> > ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
> > all installed.
> >
> > James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
> >
> >
> >
> > James
http://forums.gent
2008/12/1 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Any ideas how to fix?
>
> ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
> all installed.
>
> James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
Any ideas how to fix?
ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
all installed.
James
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
>> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
>> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>>
>> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
>
> So, I killed fire
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
>> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
>> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>>
>> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
>
> So, I killed firef
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Daniel Pielmeier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Paul Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
>> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
>>
>
> So what do you think are the followi
On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>
> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
completed successfully. Perh
ha ha ! :)
Ok thanks for the GWB citations
there is one I love too :
"I beleive that fish and human being can coexist !"
GWB
At Some Conference where he had random access.
Ok by the way the RAM doesn't seem to be a problem
since Micheal(?) has 1GB and I hope 256 MB were at least free during the
2008/11/21 Paul Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
>
So what do you think are the following SRC_URI's from the current
openoffice-3 for?
MY_PV="3.0.0.3.5"
PATCHLEVEL="OOO300"
Am Freitag 21 November 2008 01:26:28 schrieb ext Paul Hartman:
> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
You should read the ebuild, then. It has all the facts.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs |
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
so we overestimated it then?
"They misunderestimated me."
George W. Bush
November 6, 2000
Comment made in Bentonville, Arkansas.
"Those who think that they can say we're only goi
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> ..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
>> http://go-oo.org/discover/
>
> oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
This only applies to OOo 2.x
Florian Philipp wrote:
..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/
oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
--
Iain Buchanan
BOFH Excuse #414:
tachyon emissions overloading the system
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
>
>
>> Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
>> build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
>> on the hardware you are doing this on "using a binary package
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 15:51:54 schrieb ext Michael P. Soulier:
> On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> > That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
> > actual error in build.log, or attach it.
>
> http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
So you should add this part of it
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
> SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
I've had issues in the past with Gentoo on small memory systems, but if that's
the problem here, it's the first time it's happened since install.
Mik
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
> actual error in build.log, or attach it.
http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex...
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
I had the same problem, I could not compile openoffice.
I just had the same warning message and the merge stopped.
I only had 512 of RAM from which 128 are used by my graphic card,
and with the system running
081120 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 20/11/08 deface said:
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
> Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
> I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using Gentoo.
> I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Don't feed tro
On 20/11/08 deface said:
> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
Mind you, I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using
Gentoo. I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
> Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
> build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
> on the hardware you are doing this on "using a binary package that
> most likely doesn't fit i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
>
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
>
> Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
> your otherwise self-com
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
>
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
>
> Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
> your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
>
> Bye...
>
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:48, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> Running processes: 0
> deliver -- version: 1.130
> Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 261 files copied, 0 files unchanged
>
> 1 module(s):
>chart2
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
> Reason
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
To quote the error message:
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
* '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild env
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> To quote the error message:
>
> * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
> * relevant.
> * A complete build log is located at
> * '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
> * The ebuild environment file is l
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:39, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Anyone see this before?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
To quote the error message:
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
* relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
* '/var/t
*
* It is important to note that OpenOffice.org is a very fragile
* build when it comes to CFLAGS. A number of flags have already
* been filtered out. If you experience difficulty merging this
* package and use agressive CFLAGS, lower the CFLAGS and try to
* merge again. Also n
> The result: a clean compile, as near as I can tell, but useless. Now it
> quits
> silently a second or so into any startup, with or without a filename on the
> command line. No message on the terminal where
> I start it, and no clue I can see about what's wrong.
>
> I'm back to MSOffice. I h
On November 4, 2008, Philip Webb wrote:
> > I'm back to MSOffice. I hate it but it works.
Sorry, might be coming late to this discussion and offering something that was
already offered, but how about openoffice-bin ? It works for me 100% of the
time on several workstations without a glitch (bot
081103 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> After reading some of the comments here, I re-synced,
> unmerged Ooo, and emerged openoffice and hunspell.
> I already had the myspell-en build.
> The result: a clean compile, but useless.
> Now it quits silently a second or so into any startup,
> with or without a fi
> Hi
> I have am new to Gentoo.
Ok, first thing to do is resubmit this post with a useful subject title :-)
Many people like to file things away or ignore stuff that they're not
interested in, so the subject is important.
Hi
I have am new to Gentoo. My previous experience is with slackware . I
Downloaded the Live CD and installed Gentoo twice .. but the problem is
Grub is not installed. I have a dual boot with Widowz and Grub for dos
... So I tried it using the grub console
>root (hd0,4)
>kernel (hd0,4)/ --> and w
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>>
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RT
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
>
>> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>>> I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
>>> I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged
>>> right away: the console that started i
On 11/2/08, Markos Chandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
> > Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
> > > I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it
> wedged
> > > right aw
On Sunday 02 November 2008 06:39:33 Dale wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
> > I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged
> > right away: the console that started it says:
> >
> > error - missing word co
> I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
> I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file
> gets it wedged right
> away: the console that started it says:
>
> error - missing word count in dictionary file
> Hash Manager Error : 4
>
> So I'm guessing there's a pr
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
> I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged right
> away: the console that started it says:
>
> error - missing word count in dictionary file
> Hash Manager Error : 4
>
> So I'm g
I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file gets it wedged right
away: the console that started it says:
error - missing word count in dictionary file
Hash Manager Error : 4
So I'm guessing there's a problem in a spell
Yesterday I saw that openoffice 3.0 was unmasked for amd64 so I built
and installed it. It seemed to work fine on a couple test documents
that I opened, but then I ran into a problem with the one which has my
household expense spreadsheets.
I opened it and the data on one of the sheets was there
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:43:09 -0400
Denis wrote:
> > Open OpenOffice.org, go to Tools -> Options -> Java and select an
> > installed JDK.
>
> I tried selecting /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.16/jre/bin but it will not take
> it! Where is JRE installed then?
My machine has it at /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.07/jre/bin
> Open OpenOffice.org, go to Tools -> Options -> Java and select an installed
> JDK.
I tried selecting /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.16/jre/bin but it will not take
it! Where is JRE installed then?
Open OpenOffice.org, go to Tools -> Options -> Java and select an installed JDK.
Presto.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Open Office seems to run ok, but at start-up, I get the following message:
>
> javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
>
> I
The Open Office seems to run ok, but at start-up, I get the following message:
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I tried putting JRE in my PATH, just in case, but that didn't seem to
help... Anyone know a resolution to this?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
>
>> > openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
>> > machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yoursel
Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
> > openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
> > machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yourself is
> > always the better idea.
>
> Not so obviously better when it fails. Her
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
>> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
>> early.
>>
>> It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour res
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
>> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
>> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
>> early.
>>
>>
Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
> early.
>
> It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
> but shortly
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
and
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
and
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
and nothing obvious in the
080921 Florian Philipp wrote:
> app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going away soon
> and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher
> emerged with app-office/openoffice but I'm unable to find it!
As help to others who need it, here is my own note to myself :
OO Quickstarter :
Justin schrieb:
Florian Philipp schrieb:
Hi list!
Somehow I think I'm missing something:
As it seems, app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going
away real soon and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher which is
emerged with app-office/openoffice.
So far, so good, but I'm un
Florian Philipp schrieb:
Hi list!
Somehow I think I'm missing something:
As it seems, app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going
away real soon and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher which is
emerged with app-office/openoffice.
So far, so good, but I'm unable to find it!
Hi list!
Somehow I think I'm missing something:
As it seems, app-office/ooqstart-gnome and app-office/oooqs are going
away real soon and there is supposed to be a quicklauncher which is
emerged with app-office/openoffice.
So far, so good, but I'm unable to find it! There is
/usr/lib64/openo
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:01:17 Grant Edwards wrote:
> After my last "emerge -auvND world", openoffice stopped working
> for non-root users. When I run
>
> strace /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice -writer
>
> I observe that the program hangs doing a waitpid() call on a
> child that was fo
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
