On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 08:49 +0200, Luigi Pinna wrote:
> That is no true.
> If you copy your old .config and give make, the make asks you for all
> new options (I think "that" is the right one make oldconfig)
> Luigi
No. What you seeing is a little different. If you read the Makefile:
# If .con
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:49:04 +0200
Luigi Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alle giovedì 19 luglio 2007, Billy McCann ha scritto:
> [...]
> > > 2. Copy old .config and "make". In this case you miss any
> > > new kernel options.
> [...]
>
> That is no true.
> If you copy your old .config a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alle giovedì 19 luglio 2007, Billy McCann ha scritto:
[...]
> > 2. Copy old .config and "make". In this case you miss any new
> > kernel options.
[...]
That is no true.
If you copy your old .config and give make, the make asks you for al
On 7/17/07, Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:24 -0500, Billy Wayne McCann wrote:
> My purpose for pasting this into this discussion is three-fold: to
> show
> why I said what I did, to hopefully dispel the notion that I merely
> made
> this all up, and to discus
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:24 -0500, Billy Wayne McCann wrote:
> My purpose for pasting this into this discussion is three-fold: to
> show
> why I said what I did, to hopefully dispel the notion that I merely
> made
> this all up, and to discuss the relevance of the pasted text itself.
>
> I apologi
Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mick wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 13:20, Billy McCann wrote:
Hi Mick. From what I understand, using oldconfig for major
version changes (.20 -> .21) is a bad idea. Here's w
6 matches
Mail list logo
