On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Hmm, good point. I will monitor the situation.
> If there are any occurrences of wrong permissions, I think it will be
> sufficient to make an if-clause before setting the umask but maybe it
> proves unneccessary.
I think what you really want in thi
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:08:43 +0200
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Florian Philipp:
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:35:58 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > > > I've just set the umas
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Florian Philipp:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:35:58 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > > I've just set the umask 0007 in /etc/profile. With the rule that
> > > every user has his own primary group (as
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:35:58 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> > I've just set the umask 0007 in /etc/profile. With the rule that
> > every user has his own primary group (as it is default), this is
> > sufficient for my needs.
>
>
On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> I've just set the umask 0007 in /etc/profile. With the rule that
> every user has his own primary group (as it is default), this is
> sufficient for my needs.
Hmmm. That gives permissions:
rw-rw
on every single new file created by every singl
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:24:52 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > > You want to set the setgid bit on the containing directory and
> > > chgrp that directory to the group involved.
> >
> > Argh, of course!
> > I even read this stuff u
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > You want to set the setgid bit on the containing directory and
> > chgrp that directory to the group involved.
>
> Argh, of course!
> I even read this stuff up this morning but I overlooked the
> paragraph!
In all likely-hood you will want to se
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> You can later add permissions for other users or groups by using ACLs, see
> man pages of setfacl and getfacl.
...given that you have compiled your filesystem modules with ACL support.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2008 schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Then there might be a common folder for all users in a specific group
> as a simple way of sharing files. These shall be accessible by every
> user in the group but by none else, so for the user phil_fl and the
> group users: chown phil_fl:use
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:40:01 +0200
Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I'm a bit dissatisfied with the way umask and filesystem permissions
> work and I'd like to know if a) this is due to misunderstanding on my
> part and/or b) there is a clean workaround I'm unaware of.
>
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:52:29 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm a bit dissatisfied with the way umask and filesystem permissions
> > work and I'd like to know if a) this is due to misunderstanding on
> > my part
On Thursday 03 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I'm a bit dissatisfied with the way umask and filesystem permissions
> work and I'd like to know if a) this is due to misunderstanding on my
> part and/or b) there is a clean workaround I'm unaware of.
>
> Let's say I have a system wit
Hi list!
I'm a bit dissatisfied with the way umask and filesystem permissions
work and I'd like to know if a) this is due to misunderstanding on my
part and/or b) there is a clean workaround I'm unaware of.
Let's say I have a system with various users working on some sensible
data. Therefore I ha
13 matches
Mail list logo
