Re: [gentoo-user] Masked GCC question.

2005-05-10 Thread A. R.
Thank you, I will add it to the "keywords" file and use gcc-config. Regards, -AR On 5/10/05, Eugene Rosenzweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A. R. wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I am currently using GCC 3.3.5-20050130, but I would like to give > >GCC 3.4.3.20050110-r2 a try, it is currently masked

Re: [gentoo-user] Masked GCC question.

2005-05-10 Thread Eugene Rosenzweig
A. R. wrote: Hello, I am currently using GCC 3.3.5-20050130, but I would like to give GCC 3.4.3.20050110-r2 a try, it is currently masked by keyword "~x86". Is it enough to add gcc to the /etc/portage/package.keywords file and then emerge it? Is there a Gentoo-related guide to this somewhere? Th

Re: [gentoo-user] Masked GCC question.

2005-05-09 Thread A. R.
> But gcc is probably something special, and I never dared to touch it... Thanks. This is exaclty what I was trying to ask: if gcc should be treated differently than any other package when it comes to using a newer (unstable) version. My guess is that unmasking gcc is not the only thing needed her

Re: [gentoo-user] Masked GCC question.

2005-05-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le lundi 09 mai 2005 à 13:41 -0400, A. R. a écrit : > Hello, > > I am currently using GCC 3.3.5-20050130, but I would like to give > GCC 3.4.3.20050110-r2 a try, it is currently masked by keyword "~x86". > Is it enough to add gcc to the /etc/portage/package.keywords file > and then emerge it? >

[gentoo-user] Masked GCC question.

2005-05-09 Thread A. R.
Hello, I am currently using GCC 3.3.5-20050130, but I would like to give GCC 3.4.3.20050110-r2 a try, it is currently masked by keyword "~x86". Is it enough to add gcc to the /etc/portage/package.keywords file and then emerge it? Is there a Gentoo-related guide to this somewhere? Thanks in adv