On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:56:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> /var/tmp/portage should be at least 1G on a modern system, 6G+ if
> building mozilla stuff and OOo is something you intend to do.
IMO PORTAGE_TMPDIR should not be on such an important filesystem as /var.
Having system programs unable to
On Friday 12 June 2009 22:24:29 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 21:56:04 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > There's a few guidlelines one can give (but only a few). The variables
> > tend to be large than the amounts with guidelines though.
> >
> > /var/tmp/portage should be at least 1G on
Am Freitag 12 Juni 2009 21:56:04 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> There's a few guidlelines one can give (but only a few). The variables tend
> to be large than the amounts with guidelines though.
>
> /var/tmp/portage should be at least 1G on a modern system, 6G+ if building
> mozilla stuff and OOo is som
On Friday 12 June 2009 18:05:29 Dale wrote:
> Alan's point is, there is no way for us to know that. Example, I
> sometimes use http-replicator on my machine which is placed in /var.
> Therefore, that alone could need 2 to 3GBs. If you use ccache, then add
> some more. Also, doesn't portage use
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009, 12:58, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
>> The original question was "how big should /var be?" and the correct
>> answer to that question is "mu" (google it)
>>
>> If we had the output of "df -h" and "du -sh /var/*" plus a description
>> of what the machine
On Friday 12 June 2009, 12:58, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The original question was "how big should /var be?" and the correct
> answer to that question is "mu" (google it)
>
> If we had the output of "df -h" and "du -sh /var/*" plus a description
> of what the machine actually does, some general advic
On Friday 12 June 2009 12:48:24 KH wrote:
> bn schrieb:
> > Isn't "do A if you are in situation X , because of Z" the right pattern?
> >
> > m.
>
> That's only if situation x is constant and absolutely known to the one
> replying. But then it might not be of any use for somebody else. Most
> likely
bn schrieb:
>
> Isn't "do A if you are in situation X , because of Z" the right pattern?
>
> m.
>
That's only if situation x is constant and absolutely known to the one
replying. But then it might not be of any use for somebody else. Most
likely there will not be a second person with the exac
Alexander Pilipovsky schrieb:
> bn and KH, exuse me if I send not a good question, I have no many
> experience yet :)
>
>
That's where all of us started on day ;-)
kh
2009/6/11 Alexander Pilipovsky :
> bn and KH, exuse me if I send not a good question, I have no many experience
> yet :)
(try to avoid top-posts in this mailing list)
I think it has already been suggested:
Use logrotate to keep your logs down to a sensible size.
Also, you may want to empty ccac
bn and KH, exuse me if I send not a good question, I have no many
experience yet :)
bn wrote:
> KH ha scritto:
>
>
>> I totaly do agree with you. There has been nothing indicated to give a
>> one out of one answer. In case someone is a noob, ( I am still one
>> because I don't no anything about
KH ha scritto:
> I totaly do agree with you. There has been nothing indicated to give a
> one out of one answer. In case someone is a noob, ( I am still one
> because I don't no anything about how everything is working) what you
> just wrote is the answer. Like what are your needs and what resurce
On Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 00:44:51 schrieb Philip Webb:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> > > But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
> >
> > I haven't followed this thread in detail, but has anyone s
Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 00:44:51 schrieb Philip Webb:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> > But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
>
> I haven't followed this thread in detail, but has anyone suggested LVM ?
No. I'm so used to it I can't even imagine t
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:24:50 KH wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon schrieb:
>>> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:50:27 Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
>>> As much as you need.
>>>
>>> There's only one person who can determine tha
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 22:49:39 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>
>> my /var is 36gb in size.
>>
>
> Mine has only 2.
>
> Bye...
>
> Dirk
>
Mine is about 300MBs right now. It has been 1GB before tho. This is a
desktop rig so no server stuff here.
Dale
:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
I haven't followed this thread in detail, but has anyone suggested LVM ?
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, P
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Alexander
Pilipovsky wrote:
> But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
This depends on your usage, of course, and for what purpose you expect
to use /var. If you run a server with lots of logs, like a
high-traffic web server, you may want to ensure /var
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:24:50 KH wrote:
> Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:50:27 Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> >> But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
> >
> > As much as you need.
> >
> > There's only one person who can determine that. That person is you.
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:50:27 Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
>> But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
>
> As much as you need.
>
> There's only one person who can determine that. That person is you.
>
>
>
Hi,
I am sorry but I think if someone asks ab
Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 22:49:39 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> my /var is 36gb in size.
Mine has only 2.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:50:27 Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> > But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
>
> As much as you need.
>
> There's only one person who can determine that. That person is you.
my /var is 36gb in size.
But I a
KH wrote:
> Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
>
>> Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>>
>>
>>> I had a similar problem, 100% cpu usage caused by a daemon that did
>>> not respond well when network connection was lost. My
>>> /var/log/messages grew over 60GB in a few hours with t
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 21:50:27 Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
As much as you need.
There's only one person who can determine that. That person is you.
>
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 21:56:21 schrieb KH:
> Well something creating that much messages is just buggi! The cpu will
> be on havy duty no diffrence where /var is mounted. This is a bug which
> should not happen.
But if it happens, it only fills /var!
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Descrip
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
>> I had a similar problem, 100% cpu usage caused by a daemon that did
>> not respond well when network connection was lost. My
>> /var/log/messages grew over 60GB in a few hours with
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
>> I had a similar problem, 100% cpu usage caused by a daemon that did
>> not respond well when network connection was lost. My
>> /var/log/messages grew over 60GB in a few hours with the same message
>> repeated t
But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
>
>> I had a similar problem, 100% cpu usage caused by a daemon that did
>> not respond well when network connection was lost. My
>> /var/log/messages grew over
Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 20:55:16 schrieb Paul Hartman:
> I had a similar problem, 100% cpu usage caused by a daemon that did
> not respond well when network connection was lost. My
> /var/log/messages grew over 60GB in a few hours with the same message
> repeated tens of millions of times.
Well,
Paul Hartman написав(ла):
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Alexander
> Pilipovsky wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/10 Justin
>>
>>> Alexander Pilipovsky schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>> You have something big in /var. Check /var/tmp/portage or /var/log.
>>>
>>> Alos test sys-fs/ncdu or similar tools.
>>>
>
Dale написав(ла):
> Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
>
>>
>
> If you unmount /home, does any file show up under /home then? Keep in
> mind, if you have files in for example /home then mount a new partition
> on /home, the old files are still on the root partition. It just mount
> /home on to
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Alexander
Pilipovsky wrote:
>
>
> 2009/6/10 Justin
>>
>> Alexander Pilipovsky schrieb:
>>
>>
>> You have something big in /var. Check /var/tmp/portage or /var/log.
>>
>> Alos test sys-fs/ncdu or similar tools.
>>
>
> Thanks, it's was /var/log/messages that had
Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
> I cannot understand whats doing... :(
> All day smbd loaded my CPU and now GNOME said me, that I have not free
> space on /! Really,
> sh-3.2# df -h
> Файлова система Розм Вик Дост Вик% змонтований на
> /dev/sda2 28G 28G 0 100% /
> udev
2009/6/10 Justin
> Alexander Pilipovsky schrieb:
>
>
> You have something big in /var. Check /var/tmp/portage or /var/log.
>
> Alos test sys-fs/ncdu or similar tools.
>
>
Thanks, it's was /var/log/messages that had 11 GB and was not opened by any
editor.
--
Alexander Pilipovsky aka Engrave
Alexander Pilipovsky schrieb:
> I cannot understand whats doing... :(
> All day smbd loaded my CPU and now GNOME said me, that I have not free
> space on /! Really,
> sh-3.2# df -h
> Файлова система Розм Вик Дост Вик% змонтований на
> /dev/sda2 28G 28G 0 100% /
> udev
I cannot understand whats doing... :(
All day smbd loaded my CPU and now GNOME said me, that I have not free space
on /! Really,
sh-3.2# df -h
Файлова система Розм Вик Дост Вик% змонтований на
/dev/sda2 28G 28G 0 100% /
udev 10M 192K 9,9M 2% /dev
/de
36 matches
Mail list logo
