On 29/07/07, Daniel van Ham Colchete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone!!!
>
> May be somebody can shed some light here... I'm building a server here with
> 4GB of RAM memory. The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as
> fast as it should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I
On 7/30/07, Developer Edoceo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Daniel van Ham Colchete skrev:
> > > actually it's the 965, but the link Tim sent me shows that it's not a
> > > chipset limitation... It's a 32bits design limitation...
>
On 7/30/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Daniel van Ham Colchete skrev:
> > actually it's the 965, but the link Tim sent me shows that it's not a
> > chipset limitation... It's a 32bits design limitation...
>
> Thats not true, I run 32bit Gentoo with 4 GB Memory and has no slo
Daniel van Ham Colchete skrev:
> actually it's the 965, but the link Tim sent me shows that it's not a
> chipset limitation... It's a 32bits design limitation...
Thats not true, I run 32bit Gentoo with 4 GB Memory and has no slowdown
issues I can measure with the naked eye.
Seems to me like you h
On 7/28/07, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2007, at 00:28, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> > ...
> > The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as fast as it
> > should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I don't put the mem
> > option, Linux will see 4GB of memory
On 29 Jul 2007, at 00:28, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
...
The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as fast as it
should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I don't put the mem
option, Linux will see 4GB of memory available but it will be damn
slow (really).
...
My processo
On 7/28/07, Tim Allingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 09:39 +1000, Tim Allingham wrote:
> > I don't actually run 4GB of RAM in any of my intel systems, so I can't
> > comment from experience, however my suspicion would be the overhead
> > introduced from PAE, which (at leas
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 09:39 +1000, Tim Allingham wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 20:28 -0300, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> > Hello everyone!!!
> >
> > May be somebody can shed some light here... I'm building a server here
> > with 4GB of RAM memory. The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M
> > eve
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 20:28 -0300, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> Hello everyone!!!
>
> May be somebody can shed some light here... I'm building a server here
> with 4GB of RAM memory. The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M
> everything goes as fast as it should but I'm not using 1GB of memory.
>
Hello everyone!!!
May be somebody can shed some light here... I'm building a server here with
4GB of RAM memory. The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as
fast as it should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I don't put the mem
option, Linux will see 4GB of memory available but it
10 matches
Mail list logo
