On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:24:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:48 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Bill
> Longman
>
> did opine thusly:
> > On 05/18/2011 11:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Do you have an xorg.conf?
> > >
> > > I suspect X has correctly figured out what you
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:48 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Bill Longman
did opine thusly:
> On 05/18/2011 11:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Do you have an xorg.conf?
> >
> > I suspect X has correctly figured out what you have and then you turn
> > around and tell it something different. Wh
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 19:53:38 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 05:50 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Bill
> Longman
>
> did opine thusly:
> > I don't know if this is considered hijacking this thread or not but I
> > have a similar issue getting my kde to remember its screen lay
On 05/18/2011 11:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Do you have an xorg.conf?
>
> I suspect X has correctly figured out what you have and then you turn around
> and tell it something different. Whereupon it believes you.
When I have NO xorg.conf file, KDE starts in clone mode. The 1280x1024
LCD wins
Apparently, though unproven, at 05:50 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Bill Longman
did opine thusly:
> I don't know if this is considered hijacking this thread or not but I have
> a similar issue getting my kde to remember its screen layout. Two screens
> with different resolutions and kde just will NO
I don't know if this is considered hijacking this thread or not but I have a
similar issue getting my kde to remember its screen layout. Two screens with
different resolutions and kde just will NOT remember what I tell it to do.
Is there some secret X mojo I have to do to the X configuration files
2011/5/17 Florian Philipp
> Am 17.05.2011 22:22, schrieb Mick:
> > It seems that some setting changed from the 4.5 to 4.6 because now the
> > boundaries between the two monitors are no longer respected. Let me try
> to
> > explain:
> >
> > In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of an applicati
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:35:30 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 17.05.2011 22:22, schrieb Mick:
> > It seems that some setting changed from the 4.5 to 4.6 because now the
> > boundaries between the two monitors are no longer respected. Let me try
> > to explain:
> >
> > In KDE4.5 if I were to maximis
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 22:09:41 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:22:56 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of an application while it was
> > positioned say in the left monitor, it would maximise to occupy all of
> > the real estate in the left monitor only.
Am 17.05.2011 22:22, schrieb Mick:
> It seems that some setting changed from the 4.5 to 4.6 because now the
> boundaries between the two monitors are no longer respected. Let me try to
> explain:
>
> In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of an application while it was
> positioned say in th
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> It seems that some setting changed from the 4.5 to 4.6 because now the
> boundaries between the two monitors are no longer respected. Let me try to
> explain:
>
> In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of a
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:22:56 +0100, Mick wrote:
> In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of an application while it was
> positioned say in the left monitor, it would maximise to occupy all of
> the real estate in the left monitor only. If the application was in
> the right monitor, it would m
It seems that some setting changed from the 4.5 to 4.6 because now the
boundaries between the two monitors are no longer respected. Let me try to
explain:
In KDE4.5 if I were to maximise a window of an application while it was
positioned say in the left monitor, it would maximise to occupy all
13 matches
Mail list logo
