On Sunday 11 May 2008, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
> On Sunday 11 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > It's more like a magnificent hand-made piece of fine Italian
> > machinery.
>
> All Italian machinery I've had the misfortune to be acquainted with
> (from cars to washing machines) have turned out to b
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> It's more like a magnificent hand-made piece of fine Italian
> machinery.
All Italian machinery I've had the misfortune to be acquainted with (from
cars to washing machines) have turned out to be rust buckets (literally).
Italians should stick to m
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:00 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Yep, gentoo.org really seems to have been created from devs and users
> for devs and users. There is nothing like a "Features" page or "Why to
> choose Gentoo" for newcomers. Heck, you have to search hard to even
> learn whether it is suit
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Ah, but www.gentoo.org/doc actually does contain decent INFORMATION in a
> manner that I can find.
Right, but I can think of better ways to search through it by category, by
keyword, by arch, by whatever, than just use Google.
> All I ever seem to
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:43:41 +0100
>
> Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which
> > stands on its own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like
> > many other non-gentoo users) had mistake
On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:43:41 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which
> stands on its own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like many
> other non-gentoo users) had mistaken Gentoo for
> yet-another-binary-distro. Having a use
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
> > home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
> > "alive" becomes tricky
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
> home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
> "alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
> motion on th
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo
is "alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion
On Saturday 10 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
> home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo
> is "alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
> motion on the home page.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
"alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion on the home page. That's about all most people i
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
"alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion on the home page. That's about all most people inspect.
So bottom line, impr
12 matches
Mail list logo
