On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:52 AM, m...@trausch.us wrote:
> On 10/15/2012 08:38 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads-up, last time I looked nemo was not in portage. I
>> use gnome3.6 and dislike the new nautilus - still have version 3.4 of it
>> installed. But now I can switch to nem
On 10/15/2012 08:38 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up, last time I looked nemo was not in portage. I
> use gnome3.6 and dislike the new nautilus - still have version 3.4 of it
> installed. But now I can switch to nemo.
GNOME 3.6 landed? I know it was released, but I still don'
nemo is there, but for now i prefer nautilus 3.4, because nemo lacks
some of the functions (like the "extract here" context menu) :((
On 10/15/2012 02:38 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 15.10.2012 09:24, schrieb mindrunner:
>> Cinnamon is very great. Also nemo, the nautilus fork of 3.4, because
>
Am 15.10.2012 09:24, schrieb mindrunner:
> Cinnamon is very great. Also nemo, the nautilus fork of 3.4, because
> nautilus 3.6 is a very big regression in manys opinion (mine too).
Thanks for the heads-up, last time I looked nemo was not in portage. I
use gnome3.6 and dislike the new nautilus - st
Cinnamon is very great. Also nemo, the nautilus fork of 3.4, because
nautilus 3.6 is a very big regression in manys opinion (mine too).
Ive had soo many problem with gnome 3 (mainly performance), so i
switchesd to lxde.
It felt like replacing an intel pentium 4 with a core i7
now i am using
I'm back in gnome heaven again, thanks to cinnamon-1.6.1 :)
First I'd like to thank Canek for his generous help to all of us
here who have been struggling with gnome-shell. I'm sure I'll
try gnome-shell again when it's more mature, but for now I'm
sticking with cinnamon. It's a giant step backw
6 matches
Mail list logo
