On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 04:44, Nick Rout wrote:
> what is wrong with alsa's oss emulation?
My poor memory, perhaps? :)
--
Phil
Our 2nd CD: http://www.cdbaby.com/naomisfancy
Naomi's Fancy performances: http://naomisfancy.virtualave.net/schedule.html
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 01:12 -0400, Phil Sexton wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just ran across the Gnome Wave Cleaner project:
>
> http://gwc.sourceforge.net/
>
> However, it isn't in portage AFAIK.
>
> uilleann / # esearch gwc
> [ Results for search key : gwc ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
>
> * ap
Try gwc-0.20-10b, ignore others :-)
=== On Monday 30 May 2005 10:39, Phil Sexton wrote: ===
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 01:43, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> As for overall installation, more common practice is to disable
> OSS/ALSA in a kernel and install alsa-[drivers|lib|utils|oss...] and
> so on.
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 01:43, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> As for overall installation, more common practice is to disable
> OSS/ALSA in a kernel and install alsa-[drivers|lib|utils|oss...] and
> so on.
>
> I have tried the gwc few months ago, and it has now alsa support
> too (you may use oss also, as
As for overall installation, more common practice is to disable
OSS/ALSA in a kernel and install alsa-[drivers|lib|utils|oss...] and
so on.
I have tried the gwc few months ago, and it has now alsa support
too (you may use oss also, as alsa has oss simulation).
Andrew
=== On Monday 30 May 200
Hi list,
I just ran across the Gnome Wave Cleaner project:
http://gwc.sourceforge.net/
However, it isn't in portage AFAIK.
uilleann / # esearch gwc
[ Results for search key : gwc ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* app-admin/gwcc
Latest version available: 0.9.6-r2
Latest version insta
6 matches
Mail list logo