This was on sloashdot yesterday:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/02/1415220&tid=156&tid=8
A comparison of 3.4.3 and 4.0.0
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Andreas Fredriksson wrote:
Are there any evidence of said bloat and poor performance with 4.0 or
do you base it on hearsay? :-)
Well, I haven't actually heard anything. ;) My statement was based on my
experience with compiling the SETI/BOINC clients, mainly. The
executables were around 70% larger
On 5/2/05, Neil Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. A lot of stuff simply will not compile with it. The rest tend to
> produce large and slow executables. I wouldn't use it for anything yet.
> 3.4.x is the best to date.
Are there any evidence of said bloat and poor performance with 4.0 or
do
Bradley Serbu wrote:
Has anyone used this?
Yes. A lot of stuff simply will not compile with it. The rest tend to
produce large and slow executables. I wouldn't use it for anything yet.
3.4.x is the best to date.
Be lucky,
Neil
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I wouldn't recommend rebuilding your system with it. Apparently glibc
needs to release a new version 2.3.6 to be compatible. Of course,
since it's stricter than previous GCCs, it's probably a good idea to
try compiling any software you write with it to make sure that it
doesn't break in the futur
Has anyone used this?
- Brad
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
6 matches
Mail list logo
