On May 21, 2006, at 6:50 PM, JimD wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
Yes, the mini was upgraded a few months ago. $599 gives you a 1.5ghz
Core Solo, 512mb, etc and $799 gives you a 1.66ghz Core Solo, 512mb,
That would be
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> Yes, the mini was upgraded a few months ago. $599 gives you a 1.5ghz
> Core Solo, 512mb, etc and $799 gives you a 1.66ghz Core Solo, 512mb,
That would be the Duo ;)
> etc. You can go up to 2GB.
On May 21, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Sunday 21 May 2006 15:35, JimD wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 11:52 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
I have not used it though I plan on getting the OS X version
once my
Mac Mini arrives...
I have doubts abou
On Sunday 21 May 2006 15:35, JimD wrote:
> Cliff Wells wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 11:52 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> >> I have not used it though I plan on getting the OS X version once my
> >> Mac Mini arrives...
> >
> > I have doubts about the performance of a VM on that hard
On May 21, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 11:52 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
I have not used it though I plan on getting the OS X version once my
Mac Mini arrives...
I have doubts about the performance of a VM on that hardware. I've
got
a mini an
Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 11:52 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
>> I have not used it though I plan on getting the OS X version once my
>> Mac Mini arrives...
>
> I have doubts about the performance of a VM on that hardware. I've got
> a mini and it's not fast (at le
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 11:52 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> I have not used it though I plan on getting the OS X version once my
> Mac Mini arrives...
I have doubts about the performance of a VM on that hardware. I've got
a mini and it's not fast (at least running Linux). Usable for
JimD wrote:
>> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the price is right, but when I tried it I could not make it work.
>>
>> ++ kevin
>
> I am using VMware 4.x workstation. The workstation performance is
> better than the free versions. I use Linux for my main desktop, however
> I do MS Win C# progr
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> On 5/20/06, *Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I like to be one of the good guys. I'm not always sure what that
>> means
>> in particular cases, so I'm going to ask what I should do here.
>> Opinions
>> welcome. Flames somewhat less
On 5/20/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 20, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:I like to be one of the good guys. I'm not always sure what that means in particular cases, so I'm going to ask what I should do here. Opinions
welcome. Flames somewhat less so.
On 5/20/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andres Moore wrote:
> information above, you *still* can download at no charge, VMware
> Server and create in the server environment your own VMware images,
What do you mean with "In the server environment"?
Well, its was misplaced the "s
Kevin writes:
> I got a 30-day trial license for vmware, thinking to replace my aging
> Win4Lin. It seems to work (thanks to folks on this list). But I notice
> that now that I've created my VMs, I may not need workstation any
> more. I could do very well with the player, which is free.
[...]
>
Andres Moore wrote:
information above, you *still* can download at no charge, VMware
Server and create in the server environment your own VMware images,
What do you mean with "In the server environment"?
BTW, Microsoft and Virtual PC are free now too...but that's a
different story. :)
And
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I'd just go ahead and buy Workstation except for the ~$200.-- price tag.
There's also VMware Server, which is available free of charge.
Do you need the additional features of VMware Workstation? If
not, then just switch to Server.
Alexander Skwar
--
Do you know the diff
I'd just go ahead and buy Workstation except for the ~$200.-- price tag.
But somehow it seems more like a $50.00 item for what I'm doing
with it. I just feel a bit cheap using and ditching a trial version, since
I'm definitely getting a benefit from it I could not have gotten otherwise
(unless
On May 20, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:I like to be one of the good guys. I'm not always sure what that means in particular cases, so I'm going to ask what I should do here. Opinions welcome. Flames somewhat less so. I got a 30-day trial license for vmware, thinking to replace my ag
On 5/20/06, Kevin O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like to be one of the good guys. I'm not always sure what that means
in particular cases, so I'm going to ask what I should do here. Opinions
welcome. Flames somewhat less so.
I got a 30-day trial license for vmware, thinking to repl
I like to be one of the good guys. I'm not always sure what that means
in particular cases, so I'm going to ask what I should do here. Opinions
welcome. Flames somewhat less so.
I got a 30-day trial license for vmware, thinking to replace my aging
Win4Lin. It seems to work (thanks to folks on
18 matches
Mail list logo
