meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
> FIXED!
The problem seemed to be *~-file in package.use left from my last vim
session...
Huh? I once filed a request that *.bck files should be ignored, because
NEdit creates such files per default, and was told that they already
ignore those.
https://bugs.gent
Mick [13-03-17 10:56]:
> On Sunday 17 Mar 2013 09:32:21 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 03/17/2013 10:08:53 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Mick [13-03-17 09:52]:
> > > > You can try uninstalling 'app-text/poppler-0.22' and then running
> > >
> > > your update
> > >
> > > > again which shoul
On Sunday 17 Mar 2013 09:32:21 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 10:08:53 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Mick [13-03-17 09:52]:
> > > You can try uninstalling 'app-text/poppler-0.22' and then running
> >
> > your update
> >
> > > again which should draw in 'app-text/poppler-0.22.2'.
> >
On 03/17/2013 10:08:53 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Mick [13-03-17 09:52]:
> You can try uninstalling 'app-text/poppler-0.22' and then running
your update
> again which should draw in 'app-text/poppler-0.22.2'.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
Hi,
thanks for the hint, but it does not work for me
Mick [13-03-17 09:52]:
> On Sunday 17 Mar 2013 04:50:00 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while updateing this morning I got this ouput:
> >
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> > [nomerge ] app-text/texlive-core-2012-r1 USE="X tk -cjk -doc -source
> > -xetex" [ebuild N
On Sunday 17 Mar 2013 04:50:00 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while updateing this morning I got this ouput:
>
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [nomerge ] app-text/texlive-core-2012-r1 USE="X tk -cjk -doc -source
> -xetex" [ebuild N ] dev-tex/luatex-0.70.1-r1 USE="-doc
Am 17.03.2013 05:50, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Hi,
>
> while updateing this morning I got this ouput:
>
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [nomerge ] app-text/texlive-core-2012-r1 USE="X tk -cjk -doc -source
> -xetex"
> [ebuild N ] dev-tex/luatex-0.70.1-r1 USE="-doc" 0 kB
Hi,
while updateing this morning I got this ouput:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] app-text/texlive-core-2012-r1 USE="X tk -cjk -doc -source
-xetex"
[ebuild N ] dev-tex/luatex-0.70.1-r1 USE="-doc" 0 kB
[ebuild U ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs-20130224 [
- Original Message
> From: Nils Holland
> On 20:12 Sat 29 Jan , BRM wrote:
> > A little while back my server ran out of hard disk space (due to a failed
>hard
>
> > drive) and as a result my local portage mirror got destroyed.
> > Well, I fixed there server - initially by just g
Am Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:59:18 -0800 (PST)
schrieb BRM :
[...]
> I'm not a fan of nano, so I uninstalled it a long time ago. I usually use
> vim;
> not sure why vim is referencing perl libraries, but oh well.
Because you can extend vim in perl. In addition to that and the built-in
vimscript, you
On 20:12 Sat 29 Jan , BRM wrote:
> A little while back my server ran out of hard disk space (due to a failed
> hard
> drive) and as a result my local portage mirror got destroyed.
> Well, I fixed there server - initially by just grabbing a new copy of portage
> like a new install since it wa
- Original Message
> From: Neil Bothwick
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Sent: Sun, January 30, 2011 7:03:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge Problems...
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:12:26 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
>
> > Well, I fixed there server -
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:12:26 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
> Well, I fixed there server - initially by just grabbing a new copy of
> portage like a new install since it was just completely hosed, and the
> server is back up and working. However, now my desktop and laptop are
> both having problems. They
A little while back my server ran out of hard disk space (due to a failed hard
drive) and as a result my local portage mirror got destroyed.
Well, I fixed there server - initially by just grabbing a new copy of portage
like a new install since it was just completely hosed, and the server is back
What is the best way to block this package?
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:35 AM, pk wrote:
> James Stull wrote:
> > I switched my eselect profile from a generic gentoo system to desktop.
> > Unfortunately I keep getting this error when I run "emerge -uDNav world"
> I
> > tried it with the --skipfirs
James Stull wrote:
> I switched my eselect profile from a generic gentoo system to desktop.
> Unfortunately I keep getting this error when I run "emerge -uDNav world" I
> tried it with the --skipfirst flag but I continue to have this problem.
>
> * One or more packages are either masked or have m
I switched my eselect profile from a generic gentoo system to desktop.
Unfortunately I keep getting this error when I run "emerge -uDNav world" I
tried it with the --skipfirst flag but I continue to have this problem.
* One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies:
*
*
2006/8/27, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Bryan Whitehead wrote:> It is most likely a problem with your own build enviroment or bad use> flags. Post the errors you are having to this group so we can see the
> build problems.>> Before you do that, try runnin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> It is most likely a problem with your own build enviroment or bad use
> flags. Post the errors you are having to this group so we can see the
> build problems.
>
> Before you do that, try running "repdev-rebuild".
I don't kno
It is most likely a problem with your own build enviroment or bad use
flags. Post the errors you are having to this group so we can see the
build problems.
Before you do that, try running "repdev-rebuild".
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Martin S wrote:
I seem to find lots of "bad" repository servers w
I seem to find lots of "bad" repository servers when running emerge.emerge mozilla-firefox failed for quite some time (at least a day), emerge kuroo has failed for two days, just like emerge crafty.Does anyone know if there are any general problems with servers?
Regards,Martin S
21 matches
Mail list logo
