On 07/28/2011 11:51:29 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch <
> jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>
> > On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > > My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
> > > Can someone confirm this?
> >
> > I don't think so
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch <
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
> > Can someone confirm this?
>
> I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel <-> AMD
>
> Helmut.
>
> Can y
On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1
> Can someone confirm this?
I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel <-> AMD
Helmut.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson
> > >>
> > >> Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run:
> > >> $ gcc -### -e
On 2011-07-27 20:32, Mick wrote:
> It seems that on my early i7, the -march=core2 does not have all the -msse*
> flags enabled, while native does:
Acc. to this there is a flag for i7, BUT... I'm not sure if current
stable version accepts it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-
On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 21:24:33 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson
> >> >
> >> >> Another good t
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson
>> >>
>> >> Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run:
>> >> $ gcc -### -e -v -
On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson
> >>
> >> Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run:
> >> $ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h
> >>
> >> The la
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> **
>> On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote:
>>
>>
>> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I gues
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU
From: Andy Wilkinson
Date: 2011-07-27 21:09
>Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run:
>
>$ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h
>
>The last line of output will include the various CFLAGS
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote:
> **
> On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote:
>
> On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote:
>
>
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
>
>
>
>
> I guess *core2* is the right one?
>
> Yes, acc.
> to:http://en.gentoo-wiki
On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote:
>
>> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
>
>
>> I guess *core2* is the right one?
> Yes, acc. to:
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Core_2_Duo.2FQuad.2C_Xeon_51xx.2F53xx.2F54xx.2F3
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:58 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
> >
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo
> [snip]
> > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
>
> [snip]
> > ..
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
>> > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one.
>>
>> If you run this comman
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
> > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
>
> Hi,
>
> I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one.
>
> If you run this command:
> gcc -Q --help=target -march=native
>
> gcc wil
On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote:
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
> I guess *core2* is the right one?
Yes, acc. to:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Core_2_Duo.2FQuad.2C_Xeon_51xx.2F53xx.2F54xx.2F3360.2C_Pentium_Dual-Core_T23xx.2B.2FE.2C
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
> I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
Hi,
I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one.
If you run this command:
gcc -Q --help=target -march=native
gcc will tell you what it thinks are the best options for your CPU.
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 20:36:14 Alokat did opine thusly:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> ..
>
> processor : 1
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : Intel(R) Co
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> ..
>
> processor : 1
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo C
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
[snip]
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
[snip]
> ..
>
> After a short research on this website:
> http://gcc.gnu.or
Hi folks,
I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
..
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz
stepping: 11
cpu MHz : 1197.0
21 matches
Mail list logo