Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-24 Thread Mick
On Saturday 23 April 2011 21:06:25 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote: > > What do you get when you run: > > > > # eselect python list > > Available Python interpreters: > [1] python2.6 * > [2] python2.7 > [3] python3.1 OK, the next stage wo

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-23 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Saturday 23 April 2011 22:21:28 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:35 on Saturday 23 April 2011, Alan > > Mackenzie did opine thusly: > > OK. I managed to get the problem fixed, basically by trying everything, > > > > though I don't really understand what I did. This w

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:35 on Saturday 23 April 2011, Alan Mackenzie did opine thusly: > OK. I managed to get the problem fixed, basically by trying everything, > though I don't really understand what I did. This was my recipe: > > emerge --sync > emerge --update --deep --ne

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-23 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Mick. On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2011 17:35:44 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Hi, Alan. > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:43:45AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:05 on Friday 22 April 2011, Alan > > > Mackenzie >

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-23 Thread Mick
On Saturday 23 April 2011 17:35:44 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hi, Alan. > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:43:45AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:05 on Friday 22 April 2011, Alan > > Mackenzie > > > > did opine thusly: > > > Hi, Gentoo. > > > > > > In my attempt to '

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-23 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Alan. On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:43:45AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:05 on Friday 22 April 2011, Alan Mackenzie > did opine thusly: > > Hi, Gentoo. > > In my attempt to 'emerge --update --deep xfce4-meta', one sole > > package is refusing to build, namel

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:05 on Friday 22 April 2011, Alan Mackenzie did opine thusly: > Hi, Gentoo. > > In my attempt to 'emerge --update --deep xfce4-meta', one sole package > is refusing to build, namely pygtk. > > Its log file displays many (perhaps 100) error lines like: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-22 Thread Dale
Alan Mackenzie wrote: Hi, Gentoo. In my attempt to 'emerge --update --deep xfce4-meta', one sole package is refusing to build, namely pygtk. Its log file displays many (perhaps 100) error lines like: Could not write method AtkObject.get_attributes: No ArgType for AtkAttributeSet* . The

[gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please!

2011-04-22 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Gentoo. In my attempt to 'emerge --update --deep xfce4-meta', one sole package is refusing to build, namely pygtk. Its log file displays many (perhaps 100) error lines like: Could not write method AtkObject.get_attributes: No ArgType for AtkAttributeSet* . The command that caused all