Abhay Kedia wrote:
Just on a side note, etc-update will soon be deprecated. Try dispatch-conf.
This will be the tool to use in future for config updates.
Regards,
Abhay
This figures. I finally got used to etc-update and they are taking it
away. I didn't like dispatch-conf. Sorry. It's
Just on a side note, etc-update will soon be deprecated. Try dispatch-conf.
This will be the tool to use in future for config updates.
Regards,
Abhay
pgpscWY8J76WR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Holly Bostick schreef:
> Abhay Kedia schreef:
>
>>afaik etc-update does not reinitialize anything. All it looks for are
>>files that have been named in a specific way. It diffs the original
>>file with its update and then asks you whether to overwrite or not.
>>You can delete the ._cfg files or le
Abhay Kedia schreef:
> On Saturday 07 January 2006 23:24, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> What might that be.? Does something need to be re-initialized?
>> Some cache updated? I'm getting a bit confused here.
>>
>
> afaik etc-update does not reinitialize anything. All it looks for are
> files that
On Saturday 07 January 2006 23:24, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
> What might that be.? Does something need to be re-initialized? Some
> cache updated? I'm getting a bit confused here.
>
afaik etc-update does not reinitialize anything. All it looks for are files
that have been named in a specific way
Abhay Kedia schreef:
> You are not facing any problem because you are most probably not
> using xkb or in other words the keyboard layouts. If you've never
> used different keyboard layouts then you can comfortably delete the
> new-cfg files and expect to face nil problems.
Not sure if I made a mi
Abhay Kedia schreef:
> On Saturday 07 January 2006 20:47, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> So from this I deduce that
>>
>> 1) xorg 6.8.99 was *really* broken/incomplete or did something
>> radically different that etc-update and cfg-update cannot deal
>> with, since these files were never updated or of
On Saturday 07 January 2006 20:47, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
> So from this I deduce that
>
> 1) xorg 6.8.99 was *really* broken/incomplete or did something radically
> different that etc-update and cfg-update cannot deal with, since these
> files were never updated or offered to update while I when I
Eugene Rosenzweig schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> Hey ho, all--
>>
>> (I think that) Ever since I downgraded Xorg from 6.8.99 back to 6.8.2-r6
>> a couple of days ago, I've had reports from both etc-update and
>> cfg-update that there are 30 files needing to be updated (etc-update
>> reports
Holly Bostick wrote:
Hey ho, all--
(I think that) Ever since I downgraded Xorg from 6.8.99 back to 6.8.2-r6
a couple of days ago, I've had reports from both etc-update and
cfg-update that there are 30 files needing to be updated (etc-update
reports them as being in /usr/lib/X11/xkb sometimes, b
Hey ho, all--
(I think that) Ever since I downgraded Xorg from 6.8.99 back to 6.8.2-r6
a couple of days ago, I've had reports from both etc-update and
cfg-update that there are 30 files needing to be updated (etc-update
reports them as being in /usr/lib/X11/xkb sometimes, but not always).
The pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
