> On Jun 25, 2015, at 11:47, Ralf wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2015 01:29 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
>> sufficient for a typical GUI program.
>>
>> Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
>> guest... not particul
Oh, I forgot about the gtk and sdl displays... I'll test them together
with QXL.
Thanks for your hint!
But anyways, I'll need two X servers when using this setup - one on the
VM and one on the hypervisor.
Shouldn't X11 forwarding be less overhead?
Thank you
Ralf
On 06/25/2015 05:44 AM, waben.
On 06/25/2015 01:29 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
> sufficient for a typical GUI program.
>
> Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
> guest... not particularly the smartest move, but it would account for
> eve
Ralf wrote:
> Hi out there,
>
> assume the following situation:
>
> I do have a minimalistic hypervisor running a minimalistic virtual
> machine (qemu with kvm, qxl and spice).
> Both systems, hypervisor and VM are able to run X servers and
> apllications. The graphics card of the hypervisor is
What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
sufficient for a typical GUI program.
Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
guest... not particularly the smartest move, but it would account for
every usecase. Barring that, #2 should have the leas
Hi out there,
assume the following situation:
I do have a minimalistic hypervisor running a minimalistic virtual
machine (qemu with kvm, qxl and spice).
Both systems, hypervisor and VM are able to run X servers and apllications.
The graphics card of the hypervisor is connected to a monitor. This
6 matches
Mail list logo
