On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jarry wrote:
> On 16-Sep-12 20:06, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>>>
>>> * Each Apache process is consuming 80-100MB of RAM.
>>> * Squid is consuming 666MB of RAM
>>> * memcached is consuming 822MB of RAM
>>> * mysqld is consuming 886MB of RAM
>>> * The kernel is using
On 16-Sep-12 20:06, Michael Hampicke wrote:
* Each Apache process is consuming 80-100MB of RAM.
* Squid is consuming 666MB of RAM
* memcached is consuming 822MB of RAM
* mysqld is consuming 886MB of RAM
* The kernel is using 110MB of RAM for buffers
* The kernel is using 851MB of RAM for file cac
>
> * Each Apache process is consuming 80-100MB of RAM.
> * Squid is consuming 666MB of RAM
> * memcached is consuming 822MB of RAM
> * mysqld is consuming 886MB of RAM
> * The kernel is using 110MB of RAM for buffers
> * The kernel is using 851MB of RAM for file cache (which benefits squid).
>
>
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 16.09.2012 08:55, schrieb Jarry:
>> Hi,
>> strange thing happened to my web-server (apache-2.2.22-r1):
>> it started forking untill it used all ram/swap and stopped
>> responding. I counted ~60 apache processes running (ps -a),
>> all s
Am 16.09.2012 08:55, schrieb Jarry:
> Hi,
> strange thing happened to my web-server (apache-2.2.22-r1):
> it started forking untill it used all ram/swap and stopped
> responding. I counted ~60 apache processes running (ps -a),
> all sleeping, top showed no load except all memory being used.
> Log-f
Hi,
strange thing happened to my web-server (apache-2.2.22-r1):
it started forking untill it used all ram/swap and stopped
responding. I counted ~60 apache processes running (ps -a),
all sleeping, top showed no load except all memory being used.
Log-files showed nothing suspicious to me, except fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
