On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:50, Pere Gentoo wrote:
> What about this way:
>
> I've seen it on http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
>
> # mkdir /etc/runlevels/noxdm
>
> # rc-update add x noxdm(add all services from the default
> runlevel except xdm)
>
> Modify /etc/inittab
>
> id:3:i
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Pere Gentoo wrote:
> Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and
> 5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it?
>
> I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about
> resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a r
What about this way:
I've seen it on http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
# mkdir /etc/runlevels/noxdm
# rc-update add x noxdm(add all services from the default
runlevel except xdm)
Modify /etc/inittab
id:3:initdefault: id:3:initnoxdm:
l3:3:wait:/sbin
He means "default setting".
As far as I know, it isn't possible to change the default runlevel in
Gentoo without using softlevel/bootlevel, unless you want to hack it.
I haven't been able to find any documentation on it.
On 5/7/05, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 2
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 21:17 +0200, Pere Gentoo wrote:
> On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See:
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
> >
>
> And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modi
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
>
And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modify
/etc/inittab so we could define the new runlevel in it without
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
>
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. And of course this is the
logical solution.
Thanks,
--
Pere ( -- Aesux -- )
--
Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and
5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it?
I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about
resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a run
level?
Thanks,
On 5/7/05, A. Khattri <[EMA
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Mark Shields wrote:
> I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
AFAIK, the only difference between 5 and 3 is the lack of X in 3.
So you can achieve the same result merely by disabling xdm from starting
I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level
On 5/7/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:55 +0200, Pere Gentoo wrote:
> > I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:55 +0200, Pere Gentoo wrote:
> I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual
> runlevels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6. They are resumed as boot, single,
> nonetwork and default.
>
> Fine. But how to get a runlevel as runlevel 3 on other distributions,
> with th
I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual
runlevels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6. They are resumed as boot, single,
nonetwork and default.
Fine. But how to get a runlevel as runlevel 3 on other distributions,
with the same services and daemons as runevelel 5 or default but
without
12 matches
Mail list logo
