Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-26 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2010-11-25 16:37, schrieb Florian Philipp: > Anyway, if you want my solution, here it is, although it's mostly > copy'n'paste from the original link: [...] > Hope this helps, > Florian Philipp Thanks a lot for that howto, Stefan

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastian Beßler
Am 25.11.2010 16:40, schrieb Florian Philipp: Am 24.11.2010 22:13, schrieb Mick: On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: >> 2. The alternative (or additional) bash tweak: The second link keeps crashi

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 24.11.2010 22:13, schrieb Mick: > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: >> FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) >> >> TIA >> >> 1. Original article: "The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" >>

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 25.11.2010 12:21, schrieb Adam Carter: > > Would you share? > > +1 > > I only have an empty /sys/fs/cgroup with the following config on 2.6.36, > so please share the kernel config as well. > I guess you have to mount your cgroup there, first. The original link describes, how. I don't h

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Adam Carter
> Would you share? > > +1 I only have an empty /sys/fs/cgroup with the following config on 2.6.36, so please share the kernel config as well. # zgrep CGROUP /proc/config.gz CONFIG_CGROUPS=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_CGROUP_NS=y CONFIG_CGROUP_FREEZER=y CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y CONFIG_C

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-25 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 23.11.2010 19:26, schrieb Florian Philipp: > BTW: I've implemented a slightly adjusted version of the bash script > (Ubuntu alternative) for Gentoo yesterday and I must say, I'm really > impressed. Would you share?

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-24 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:42:51 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) > > TIA > > 1. Original article: "The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" > > > 2. The

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 23.11.2010 17:42, schrieb 7v5w7go9ub0o: > FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) > > TIA > > 1. Original article: "The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" > > > 2. The alternative (o

Re: [gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9u...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) > > TIA > > 1. Original article: "The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" >

[gentoo-user] 200-line patch to kernel => superkernel

2010-11-23 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
FYI. If anyone understands the bash tweak, please explain :-) TIA 1. Original article: "The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders" 2. The alternative (or additional) bash tweak: