Am 12.12.2009 22:18, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 12.12.2009 21:56, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
>
>> Anytime, and glad to hear that you're back up and working happily again! :)
>
> old phenomenon: post "solved" and it crashes again ...
Just for reference: emerged slim instead of gdm now ... wor
Am 12.12.2009 21:56, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
> Anytime, and glad to hear that you're back up and working happily again! :)
old phenomenon: post "solved" and it crashes again ...
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.12.2009 19:15, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
>
>>> I am now trying to use your solution, I just have to find a way to make
>>> it work with my pam_mount-based setup. Working on it ;-)
>>
>> Hmm... that'd certainly complicate it... since
Am 11.12.2009 19:15, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
>> I am now trying to use your solution, I just have to find a way to make
>> it work with my pam_mount-based setup. Working on it ;-)
>
> Hmm... that'd certainly complicate it... since mine bypasses any auth
> of the user ;)
Played around with it, the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
>
>> Respawns on close/crash... doesn't allow attempts to start more than
>> once (hence the 'lockfile' type hack in the script), doesn't break on
>> a stale lockfile, and does whatever the
Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
> Respawns on close/crash... doesn't allow attempts to start more than
> once (hence the 'lockfile' type hack in the script), doesn't break on
> a stale lockfile, and does whatever the user ('myuser' should be
> replaced with a real username) wishes in t
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
>
>> # auto_start_x.sh
>
> Thanks for that! I will maybe set that up but shouldn't gdm work as
> well? I mean it doesn't crash for *all* ~x86-users, correct?
>
> ;-) Stefan
I'd expect it to
Am 10.12.2009 05:41, schrieb Joshua Murphy:
> # auto_start_x.sh
Thanks for that! I will maybe set that up but shouldn't gdm work as
well? I mean it doesn't crash for *all* ~x86-users, correct?
;-) Stefan
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 09.12.2009 16:31, schrieb walt:
>
>>> So it seems more gdm/gnome-related to me, right?
>>
>> That would be my guess. I don't use gdm so I don't know how to fix it.
>> I use startx with "exec /etc/X11/Sessions/gnome" in my ~/.xinitr
Am 09.12.2009 16:31, schrieb walt:
>> So it seems more gdm/gnome-related to me, right?
>
> That would be my guess. I don't use gdm so I don't know how to fix it.
> I use startx with "exec /etc/X11/Sessions/gnome" in my ~/.xinitrc. You
> could try that to see if gnome starts correctly.
Yep, that
On 12/08/2009 11:28 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I tested DISPLAYMANAGER="xdm" now, X is coming up and lets me log in ...
but I only get some ugly and very simple desktop (xsm ...). This only as
a test ...
So it seems more gdm/gnome-related to me, right?
That would be my guess. I don't us
Am 09.12.2009 01:24, schrieb walt:
> Looks to me like the X server *is* running, unless you left out the error
> message at the end of the log.
No, nothing left out.
> Why do you say X didn't come up?
Because it says so. I get that dialog "X-Server could not be started"
(similar, I get the
On 12/08/2009 11:26 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Greets, gentoo-users,
I wanted to go to full ~x86 on my thinkpad these days, so I started with
an "emerge -avu system" and after a successful reboot I did "emerge
-avuDN world".
X11 didn't come up anymore ... I even tried a "emerge -e world",
13 matches
Mail list logo
