Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2008, James wrote: > > Volker Armin Hemmann tu-clausthal.de> > > writes: > > > > > that is bullshit. If you have ever followed the ml you would > > > > > now it. > > > > > > > > It's been languishing in -mm for ages, never

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +, James wrote: > > > > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will nev

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > So Hans and others could develop very cool features that 'plugin' > > > to reiser4fs, but, if they choose, folks would have to *PAY* for > > > these advanced features. That's the whole

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +, James wrote: > > > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never > > > make it into the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > So Hans and others could develop very cool features that 'plugin' > > to reiser4fs, but, if they choose, folks would have to *PAY* for > > these advanced features. That's the whole rub (in essence) as to > > why reiser4fs will never make i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 17 February 2008, James wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann tu-clausthal.de> writes: > > > > that is bullshit. If you have ever followed the ml you would > > > > now it. > > > > > > It's been languishing in -mm for ages, never mind any progress > > > that namesys itself might make with their

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +, James wrote: > > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never make it > > into the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do not trust Hans Reiser*... > > > > His abusive shenanigans a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-16 Thread felix
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +, James wrote: > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never make it into > the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do not trust Hans Reiser*... > > His abusive shenanigans are an issue, but, not really why reiser4fs is doomed. As I und

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, James wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann tu-clausthal.de> writes: > > > > that is bullshit. If you have ever followed the ml you would now it. > > > > > > It's been languishing in -mm for ages, never mind any progress that > > > namesys itself might make with their own cod

[gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status

2008-02-16 Thread James
Volker Armin Hemmann tu-clausthal.de> writes: > > > that is bullshit. If you have ever followed the ml you would now it. > > > > It's been languishing in -mm for ages, never mind any progress that > > namesys itself might make with their own code. Well, I'm no Reiser expert, but a few days ago