quoth the 7v5w7go9ub0o:
> Nope. I'm sure they're busy, and took the message at face value.
>
> 'Twould be nice if someone added a little note to the categories
> indicating that Gentoo Linux is the place to put version bumps; it might
> get more of us newbies involved and "owning" part of the
Florian Philipp wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:46 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
Florian Philipp wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
(Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/
Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The pro
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:46 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> >> (Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9)
> >>
> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/
> >
> > Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The pr
Florian Philipp wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
(Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/
Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The proper thing to do
would be to open a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org and request a
(Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/
Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The proper thing to do
would be to open a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org and request a version
bump.
Like this one: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194832
5 matches
Mail list logo
