Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, and it wouldn't matter. Even if 99.9% of ebuilds respected it, yours
> could be in the other 0.1%. It should be fairly high though. Just run the
> command, Ctrl-C when the ./configure stage has completed and look in
> config.log in the work directory
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:20:59 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-rootcommit" emerge cvs
> >
> > usually works, although not all ebuilds respect $EXTRA_ECONF.
>
> Can you make an educated guess about that? I mean is it a pretty high
> percentage that allow that env flag?
No
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is
> >> deprecated?
> >
> > It's:
> > /etc/portage/profi
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I wanted to use `./configure --enable-rootcommit' (or similar) since
>> this is a single user machine.
>
> EXTRA_ECONF="--enable-rootcommit" emerge cvs
>
> usually works, although not all ebuilds respect $EXTRA_ECONF.
Can you make an educated
Arrgh, trying to do it from memory! Thanks for the correction.
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 15:41, Robert Crawford wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is
> > deprecated?
>
> It's:
> /etc/portag
On 12/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is
> >> deprecated?
> >
> > It's:
> > /etc/portage/profile
Robert Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is
>> deprecated?
>
> It's:
> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
Is it really /etc/portage/profile though? All my oth
2:35:17 EST
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: How to make emerge skirt a package built from
> > tar.gz
> >
> > Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > emerge --inject 'app-foo/bar-1.2.3'
> > >
> > > S
Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is deprecated?
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2005/12/14 Wed AM 12:35:17 EST
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: How to make emerge skirt a package built from
> tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
emerge --inject 'app-foo/bar-1.2.3'
Sounds like that's what you're thinking of.
--
That may be a way to do it. It isn't what I was thinking of though.
I've never heard of this and man emerges has almost nothing to say
Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> emerge --inject 'app-foo/bar-1.2.3'
>
> Sounds like that's what you're thinking of.
> --
That may be a way to do it. It isn't what I was thinking of though.
I've never heard of this and man emerges has almost nothing to say
about it. And `man inject' d
11 matches
Mail list logo
