On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:25:07 +0200, Danis Petkakis wrote:
> indeed i did not understand the first suggestion about top-posting and
> did not
> know about this rule...it is the first time i'm taking part in a list
> so i will try to behave
> with the rules of it and not make any difficulties so i ca
2009/2/9 Neil Bothwick
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:37:00 +, Stroller wrote:
>
> > >> ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
> > >
> > > The suggestion was not to top-post...
> >
> > He was replying to one of my messages, and I did not suggest that.
>
> No, although the response
On 9 Feb 2009, at 02:30, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:37:00 +, Stroller wrote:
ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
The suggestion was not to top-post...
He was replying to one of my messages, and I did not suggest that.
No, although the response wa
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:37:00 +, Stroller wrote:
> >> ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
> >
> > The suggestion was not to top-post...
>
> He was replying to one of my messages, and I did not suggest that.
No, although the response was "will do as suggested" not "will
On 8 Feb 2009, at 13:39, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:51:00 +0200, Danis Petkakis wrote:
ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
The suggestion was not to top-post...
He was replying to one of my messages, and I did not suggest that.
I was actually slightly n
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:51:00 +0200, Danis Petkakis wrote:
> ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
The suggestion was not to top-post...
--
Neil Bothwick
"Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy."
-- Robert Heinlein
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ok thank you for your response...will do as suggested...
Danis
2009/2/8 Stroller
> He wrote the lines of his post upside down, because he thinks you're wrong
> to top-post.
>
> If you read it as:
>
>> Usually, you have to
>>> umount it before you
>>> put it too sleep. There's
>>> almost always
He wrote the lines of his post upside down, because he thinks you're
wrong to top-post.
If you read it as:
Usually, you have to
umount it before you
put it too sleep. There's
almost always something
waking it up if it's
still mounted.
It makes perfect sense & you don't need to ask any furthe
Danis Petkakis wrote:
> ok i tried 'hdparm -y /dev/sda' and though i can hear a little noise as
> if the disk is in sleep
> mode after a while (5 secs) it makes a noise as though it is spinning up
> again...
That's why I mentioned laptop-mode-tools. If configured properly, it
ensures that the driv
in both drives i try to spin down i use ntfs as filesystem...
2009/2/7 Dale
> Danis Petkakis wrote:
> > you're telling me i have to umount it first and then put it to sleep?
> > because it is mounted it cannot be put to sleep?
> >
>
> If you have a journalized file system, you may have to. Ever
Danis Petkakis wrote:
> you're telling me i have to umount it first and then put it to sleep?
> because it is mounted it cannot be put to sleep?
>
If you have a journalized file system, you may have to. Every time it
updates the journal it will spin the drive back up. I think some of the
gurus n
you're telling me i have to umount it first and then put it to sleep?
because it is mounted it cannot be put to sleep?
2009/2/7 Nikos Chantziaras
> still mounted.
> waking it up if it's
> almost always something
> put it too sleep. There's
> umount it before you
> Usually, you have to
>
> Danis
still mounted.
waking it up if it's
almost always something
put it too sleep. There's
umount it before you
Usually, you have to
Danis Petkakis wrote:
ok i tried 'hdparm -y /dev/sda' and though i can hear a little noise as
if the disk is in sleep
mode after a while (5 secs) it makes a noise as th
ok i tried 'hdparm -y /dev/sda' and though i can hear a little noise as if
the disk is in sleep
mode after a while (5 secs) it makes a noise as though it is spinning up
again...also
'hdparm -C /dev/sda' shows the disk active/idle...i also tried with 'hdparm
-S12 /dev/sda'
but couldn't tell whether
Danis Petkakis wrote:
> 2009/2/7 Remy Blank mailto:remy.bl...@pobox.com>>
>
> Danis Petkakis wrote:
> > hello there i would like to know if there is such a thing as a power
> > saving scheme as far as hard disks are
> > concerned...i would like my hard disks to spin down when they
>
2009/2/7 Remy Blank
> Danis Petkakis wrote:
> > hello there i would like to know if there is such a thing as a power
> > saving scheme as far as hard disks are
> > concerned...i would like my hard disks to spin down when they are not
> > being accessed after a defined
> > period of time...is that
Danis Petkakis wrote:
> hello there i would like to know if there is such a thing as a power
> saving scheme as far as hard disks are
> concerned...i would like my hard disks to spin down when they are not
> being accessed after a defined
> period of time...is that possible? any hints on how to do
17 matches
Mail list logo