Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Break In attempts

2007-10-16 Thread Mark Shields
On 10/13/07, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 07 October 2007, Remy Blank wrote: > > Mick wrote: > > > I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users > > > with a public key in their ~/.ssh can login. > > > > This is the first and most important step. This means

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Break In attempts

2007-10-13 Thread Mick
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Remy Blank wrote: > Mick wrote: > > I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users > > with a public key in their ~/.ssh can login. > > This is the first and most important step. This means that the only real > problem is that your logs fill with fa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Break In attempts

2007-10-07 Thread Hex Star
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=howto+secure+ssh&btnG=Google+Search

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Break In attempts

2007-10-07 Thread Mick
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Remy Blank wrote: > Mick wrote: > > I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users > > with a public key in their ~/.ssh can login. > > This is the first and most important step. This means that the only real > problem is that your logs fill with fa

[gentoo-user] Re: Break In attempts

2007-10-07 Thread Remy Blank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > I have already disabled PAM authentication on sshd so that only users with a > public key in their ~/.ssh can login. This is the first and most important step. This means that the only real problem is that your logs fill with failed log