On Thu, 28 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
It' sin the apache docs, called "IP based virtual hosts" if memory serves.
If you want to run SSL, then IP vhosts is the only way to go.
--
A
On Sunday 31 May 2009 01:27:07 Mick wrote:
> > Added to that, my employer is an ISP and not shy with budgets, so a
> > purchase order for new hardware in a case like this will not raise any
> > eyebrows. For me, it's a low level of risk high impact scenario and the $
> > cost is low.
> >
> > In a b
On Thursday 28 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:51:26 Stroller wrote:
> > > So I recommend option 4:
> > >
> > > Pony up the money for server #2
> >
> > Just for the sake of satanic advocacy, could you indulge me, please?
> >
> > Let's say Mick is the administrator for al
Alan McKinnon wrote:
So I have opted for #5: vserver-sources, and I have multiple instances
of apache running in pretty good isolated vserver-guests.
My €0.0144 ...
I used vserver once, and was very impressed with the performance. I didn't use
it eventually, as I found administering a real ru
On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:51:26 Stroller wrote:
> > So I recommend option 4:
> >
> > Pony up the money for server #2
>
> Just for the sake of satanic advocacy, could you indulge me, please?
>
> Let's say Mick is the administrator for all domains in question. He
> decides to run the two sites on
On 28 May 2009, at 20:12, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Your problem will be that only one apache instance can run on port 80.
Your options:
1. Run the ecommerce apache on a different port.
2. Install a second NIC with a different IP and bind each apache to
port 80 on
it's own nic.
Or run the s
On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:34:33 Jarry wrote:
> Ad.2: he can assign 2 IPs to single NIC. No need to buy the second NIC.
>
> BTW, I was in a similar situation: one user wanted to use notoriously
> buggy phpBB, but I did not want to risk compromising my other web-pages.
>
> So I have opted for #5: vs
On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:33:02 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 28 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > A chroot jail is of no real use to you here - it's a development tool and
> > amazingly useful for gentoo installs, but has no real security or process
> > separation benefits. So says Alan - not me, a
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2009 20:57:08 Mick wrote:
I am considering running an ecommerce website (php+mysql) on a server which
is already running apache (with a number of virtual hosts) and a couple of
php+mysql driven websites.
The ecommerce website is meant to be used to proce
On Thursday 28 May 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> A chroot jail is of no real use to you here - it's a development tool and
> amazingly useful for gentoo installs, but has no real security or process
> separation benefits. So says Alan - not me, a different one.
OK, thanks for this to both of you!
On Thursday 28 May 2009 20:57:08 Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am considering running an ecommerce website (php+mysql) on a server which
> is already running apache (with a number of virtual hosts) and a couple of
> php+mysql driven websites.
>
> The ecommerce website is meant to be used to process c
Hi All,
I am considering running an ecommerce website (php+mysql) on a server which is
already running apache (with a number of virtual hosts) and a couple of
php+mysql driven websites.
The ecommerce website is meant to be used to process customer payments. I
have not looked into setting up s
12 matches
Mail list logo
