Re: [gentoo-user] : [OT: JOKE]virtual Windows solution...

2006-07-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As shown in the topic this reply is a joke, of course but, for the sake > of theory, one could take the opposite way: install Windows to run a > real operating system under it. if you intend to run Linux under win32, I suggest CoLinux. It should also

Re: [gentoo-user] : [OT: JOKE]virtual Windows solution...

2006-07-14 Thread jarry
"Nico Schümann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of the most popular false beliefs is "linux can't run games". > > I don't play computer games. But if someone sais this (and this > happens from time to time), I run Nexuiz or Quake4-Demo or stuff. And > everytime I show people: "Hey, you don't n

Re: [gentoo-user] : [OT: JOKE]virtual Windows solution...

2006-07-14 Thread Nico Schümann
2006/7/14, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Linux can run trash even now. The funniest thing is that *trashers* don't know it and they think windows is irreplaceable for great many programs but that's not true...at least not any more. And so I don't use windows. The only thing I miss is the pe

Re: [gentoo-user] : [OT: JOKE]virtual Windows solution...

2006-07-13 Thread Daniel Iliev
Nico Schümann wrote: > Actually, I'd never do dirty things like these. But I really don't > know how the performance would be. I think, the host sets the > performance limits. And if the host is kina trash (M$), then there is > no use of it. > By the way, I recently read about Vanderpool and Windo

Re: [gentoo-user] : [OT: JOKE]virtual Windows solution...

2006-07-13 Thread Daniel Iliev
Jarry wrote: > Hi, > > I still can not get rid completely of MS-Windows, because I am > forced to use some MS-Windows programs. So I am looking for some > "virtual" solution, which I could use with my gentoo-workstation. > > Now my question is, what is generaly a better solution > (stability, com