Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --depclean" vs. "revdep-rebuild"

2009-04-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:12:39 -0400, David Relson wrote: > However, revdep-rebuild still insists ati-drivers-8.552 is needed. The > following message seems to be at the heart of the problem: > > broken /usr/lib64/libAMDXvBA.so.1.0 (requires libstdc++.so.5) Are these the binary or open source d

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --depclean" vs. "revdep-rebuild"

2009-04-26 Thread David Relson
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:17:39 -0500 Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson > > wrote: > >> As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and > >> "revdep-rebuild". > >> > >> "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed > >> reasonable.

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --depclean" vs. "revdep-rebuild"

2009-04-26 Thread Dale
Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson > wrote: > >> As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild". >> >> "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable. >> >> "revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reaso

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --depclean" vs. "revdep-rebuild"

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, David Relson wrote: > As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild". > > "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable. > > "revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reasonable. > > When I run the commands

[gentoo-user] "emerge --depclean" vs. "revdep-rebuild"

2009-04-26 Thread David Relson
As a "cleanup" test, I've run "emerge --depclean" and "revdep-rebuild". "emerge --depclean" removed approx 85 files, which seemed reasonable. "revdep-rebuild" then rebuilt 7 or 8 packages -- also reasonable. When I run the commands again, "emerge --depclean" removes the packages that "revdep-reb