Hello all,
I have solved the problem now. It was due to a missing library issue in HAL.
A ln -s /var/lib64/libvolume_id.so.0 /lib64/libvolume_id.so.0 fixed it.
Greetings,
Niklas
reQuiem23 wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with remov
Dirk Heinrichs-2 wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 14:03:29 schrieb reQuiem23:
>
>> when i remove checkfs, though, it
>> would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would
>> it?
>
> Sure it would.
>
>> the mounted /home part
Bugzilla from en.a...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> reQuiem23 wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the
>> services
>> in question is checkfs - localmount
Marc Arens-3 wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:10:30 -0800 (PST)
> reQuiem23 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
>> >
>> > reQuiem23 schrieb:
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
>> >> I emerged G
Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
>
> reQuiem23 schrieb:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable
>> media.
>> It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
>> stick, the system reco
Hello all,
I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable media.
It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
stick, the system recognizes it (as you can see in the output of tail
/var/log/messages), but nautilus doesn't show a desktop icon or even
hi all,
i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services
in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so why
is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same?
Saphirus Sage wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:23 PM, reQuiem23
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Albert Hopkins-4 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:48 -0800, reQuiem23 wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>&g
reQuiem23 wrote:
>
>
>
> Albert Hopkins-4 wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:48 -0800, reQuiem23 wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and
>>> copy
>>> (cp) my w
Albert Hopkins-4 wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:48 -0800, reQuiem23 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and copy
>> (cp) my whole root-dir into that new partition, change the /etc/fstab,
>> add
>
Graham Murray wrote:
>
> reQuiem23 writes:
>
>> yeah, but my /boot is still ext3 and grub IS actually loading the system,
>> it
>> even runs uvesafb. or is grub even incompatible with ext4
>> root-filesystems?
>> i thought this was entirely
Paul Hartman-3 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:04 AM, reQuiem23
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul Hartman-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM, reQuiem23
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>&
Paul Hartman-3 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM, reQuiem23
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and copy
>> (cp) my whole root-dir into that new partition, change the /etc/fstab,
Joshua Murphy-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48 AM, reQuiem23
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and copy
>> (cp) my whole root-dir into that new partition, change the /etc/fstab,
Rodolphe Rocca-2 wrote:
>
> reQuiem23 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and copy
>> (cp) my whole root-dir into that new partition, change the /etc/fstab,
>> add
>> an entry to the grub.conf and
Hi all,
i just had the idea to make a new ext4 partition (via mkfs.ext4) and copy
(cp) my whole root-dir into that new partition, change the /etc/fstab, add
an entry to the grub.conf and booting into that new partition. My /boot is
on a separate ext3 partition, so this is not a problem. The kerne
16 matches
Mail list logo
