[gentoo-user] Re: Building packages in different prefix without rebuilding system packages

Hi François-Xavier, On 5/14/20 7:02 AM, François-Xavier Carton wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way of installing packages in a different prefix while still > using system packages? I've tried setting EPREFIX, however doing that > will install all dependencies in the prefix, even if there are already

[gentoo-user] Re: gentoo robot vacuum

On 10/4/19 2:13 AM, james wrote: > Gentoo community, > > Robotic vacuum cleaners are all the rage nowadays. > I'd like to buy/build one, that also has remote camera (so I can see what > troubles it is having by reviewing stored video) find it easy, and make sure > it's not just banging against t

[gentoo-user] eno1 became back eth0

Hi Alarig, On 11/13/19 5:54 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > > PS: Old interface names were way more guessable than the new ones (eth0 > used to work 99% of time). I really don’t understand why someone woke a > morning a though “we should randomise this, it’s too much stable”. While I've no idea about

[gentoo-user] Re: LVM2 problem, meta data format change?

Hi Paul, as an LVM user without deeper knowledge, stumbled upon your question without any reply yet, and my fear was to run into the same when updating lvm2. On 5/17/19 2:26 PM, Paul Colquhoun wrote: > Recently I found that new kernels were not booting for me, because they could > not assemble t