Am 04. September 2017 um 12:07 Uhr -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 :
> Even if they can not present an argument like I have,
> they will probably only notice it if it misbehaves in some way. If it
> misbehaves more than other software on their system, who is to say it
> isn't a poorly designed language and/or
Am 03. September 2017 um 15:35 Uhr -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 :
> I think the takeaway from Alan's comment is that Python is unnaturally
> stable compared to other interpreted languages. One might be inclined
> to think Python developers consider their work to be a widely used
> tool as opposed to a toy
Am 02. September 2017 um 21:18 Uhr -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 :
> Seeing as the OP is saying there are 3 versions queued for merge and
> he has not installed any of them by hand it looks like Alan is
> right. Perhaps the OP is using "old" Ruby based software, but software
> of that age in another languag
Am 02. September 2017 um 22:57 Uhr +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon
:
> OK, so disclaimer up front. I detest Ruby. I hate it with a passion.
There is nothing one can do against that, but...
> Each new minor version of ruby is a whole new language and the devs
> are OK with large breaking changes betw
I find bashburn a fairly nice tool, but for reasons unknown to me it
always fails when burning DVDs. Otherwise it does fine.
Marvin
--
Blog: https://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:57:19AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Honestly, as somebody who monitors all the systemd bugs on Gentoo it
> isn't actually that much work, and I suspect that it wouldn't be that
> much work maintaining openrc scripts on Arch. I doubt they rename the
> apache binary 3x pe
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:50:17PM +, Mick wrote:
> Well what do you know?! Alternative to monolithic stack solutions now exist
> as alternatives for other distros too:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/archopenrc/
The GitHub links on that page are broken (404).
I was an Arch user befor
Am Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:07:03 +0100
schrieb Stroller :
> This doesn't address the wider implications of this dodgy checksums,
> but I think most people on this list install using SystemRescueCD.
Okay, I’ll go that route then. Thank you again!
Greetings
Marvin
--
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP
Am Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:26:50 +0300
schrieb Andrew Savchenko :
> Checksums are indeed wrong, whirlpool one too. Thanks for noticing,
> I opened a bug for this:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588062
Okay, thank you. This has been now marked as a duplicate of another
bug[1], which in turn
Hi everyone,
I was wanting to give Gentoo a try today, but failed to verify the
current minimal installation medium for amd64[1]. The .iso file does
not match the SHA512 checksum provided in the .DIGESTS.ASC file[2]. The
wrong checksum was confirmed by a user in the #gentoo IRC channel on
freenode
10 matches
Mail list logo
