Hello yall!
This is half-topic but I think everyone will benefit from the results.
Here at my company we have 18 Gentoo servers spread over 3 data
centers and our office. We have well defined and time-proven (one of
the servers was installed in 2004 and it's still the same Gentoo)
processes on mo
Hello yall!
This is half-topic but I think everyone will benefit from the results.
Here at my company we have 18 Gentoo servers spread over 3 data centers and
our office. We have well defined and time-proven (one of the servers was
installed in 2004 and it's still the same Gentoo) processes on mo
On 7/30/07, Developer Edoceo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Daniel van Ham Colchete skrev:
> > > actually it's the 965, but the link Tim sent me shows that it's not a
> >
On 7/28/07, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2007, at 00:28, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> > ...
> > The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as fast as it
> > should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I don't put the m
On 7/28/07, Tim Allingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 09:39 +1000, Tim Allingham wrote:
> > I don't actually run 4GB of RAM in any of my intel systems, so I can't
> > comment from experience, however my suspicion would be the overhead
> > introduced from PAE, which (at leas
Hello everyone!!!
May be somebody can shed some light here... I'm building a server here with
4GB of RAM memory. The fact is, if I boot with mem=3072M everything goes as
fast as it should but I'm not using 1GB of memory. If I don't put the mem
option, Linux will see 4GB of memory available but it
Hello yall!
I have a collocation server with a 2 Mbps bandwidth for my e-mail. I would
like to use SFQ to do a more fair split of this bandwidth between my users
(~500). I think SFQ is a very good idea: it will split the available
bandwidth between the current connections (almost) equally, and it
On 5/13/07, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:42:45 Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> To solve this, I'm seeing 2 options right now. The first would be buying
a
> KVM-over-IP unit. But, a KVM-over-IP unit with the number of ports I
need
> is
On 5/14/07, Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 15:42:45 -0300
"Daniel van Ham Colchete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thinking about other options, does anyone have any other tip for me? Am
I
> going in the right direction?
The
Hello yall,
first, this is a kind of "half-topic" issue, but I'll be using Gentoo and
the matter is on the interest of this list.
I'll be building a Gentoo Cluster soon in a datacenter 6000 miles (9600 km)
away from me... This project has to be as cost efficient as possible. A lot
of research wa
Hello everyone
Here on my company we are going to start deploying Gentoo Linux on our
customers. Every server will have the very same installed packages,
the very same use flags, very same cflags, only a few configurations
will differ.
I would like the deployment and maintenance to be done a
On 12/5/06, Pawel Kraszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 4 grudnia 2006 22:49, Daniel van Ham Colchete napisał:
> I'm planing on using the eth1 ethernet with DRBD. My problem is that
> although the NICs support gigabit ethernet, they only negociate with
>
On 12/4/06, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have two servers here with two Intel E1000 NIC each.
>
> I'm planing on using the eth1 ethernet with DRBD. My problem is that
> although the NICs support gigabit ether
Thanks Rick,
I'm going to try that tomorrow. I thought CAT5e cable would support
gigabit connections.
Best regards,
Daniel Colchete
On 12/4/06, Khabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my understanding thats not a problem with the OS, but with the crossover
cable itself. The os is seeing it as a
Hi all!
I have two servers here with two Intel E1000 NIC each.
I'm planing on using the eth1 ethernet with DRBD. My problem is that
although the NICs support gigabit ethernet, they only negociate with
100baseT/Full. I'm using a CAT-5E crossover cable between the servers.
Here is my dmesg (both
15 matches
Mail list logo
