Adam Carter writes:
>> Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
>>
>> 19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
>> Available python interpreters:
>> [1] python2.6
>> [2] python3.1
>> 19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python set 2
>> 19:17:31 poke:~ $ emerge --i
Albert Hopkins writes:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
> I would think (hope) that the python maintainers were smart enough to
> know whether installing Python 3 would break portage. Then again, this
> is Gentoo ;-)
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it
Timur Aydin writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have synced my ~x86 system yesterday and after it completed, the
> resolver doesn't work for some programs anymore. For example, ping
> says "unknown host name". It doesn't even contact the dns
> server, which is running on the same host. But dig works
> fine. Al
Dale writes:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>>
>> Uh.. you don't "disable" it. You simply don't use the alias.
>>
> Oh, OK.If it is set up to add that
> option, how do you tell it not to use it?
You can type backslash before a alias to not use the alias.
alias ls='ls --color'
now ls lists with co
"James Homuth" writes:
> Will my system blow up at me if I remove PAM?
I have used Gentoo at home for many years now. And I have never used
pam.
I even have
# Don't want these, ever
>sys-libs/pam-0
In /etc/portage/package.mask so that I detect if anything wants to pull
in pam. A few times s
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to disable job control on a machine with 650+ users because way
> too many of them believe that Ctrl-Z is how you kill processes. So, I
> want Ctrl-Z to basically do nothing. I've found a great solution:
>
> set +m
One other way could
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> If by "successful" you mean the call returns >= 0,
> then they're successful.
Yes,
>
> There is this, however:
> <...>
> open("/etc/default/nss", 0_RDONLY) =-1 ENODENT (No
> such file or directory)
> <...>
> connect(4,{sa_family=AF_FILE,
> path="/var/
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> root. Look for other occurences of geteuid in
>> strace output.
>
> Most similar instance is following the line:
> <...>
> readlink("/proc/self/fd/0, "/dev/tty2", 4095) = 9
> getuid32() = 0
You should aslo check for any o
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most similar instance is following the line:
> <...>
> readlink("/proc/self/fd/0, "/dev/tty2", 4095) = 9
> getuid32() = 0
>^
> note: no 'e'
Yes that's also interesting, uid is zero, which is should be since you
are runn
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> strace:
> <...>
> open("/etc/sudoers", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES
> (Permission denied)
> geteuid32() = 1
hmm, strange, geteuid should return euid which should be zero for
root. Look for other occurences of geteuid in str
I was wrong. Sorry.
I realize now that this cannot be your problem, sudo tell you that it
is not setuid if it's not.
$ sudo chmod -s sudo
$ sudo ls
sudo: must be setuid root
>
> Thanks Christer, never saw that command before, but
> like I told Walter, a listing for sudo is indeed:
> ---s-
"Walter Dnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:14:53PM -0700, maxim wexler wrote
>> Hi group,
>>
>> I connect to the web using
>>
>> $sudo /usr/sbin/pon
>>
>> on one machine(2.6.20-gentoo-r6). On another
>> machine(2.6.19-gentoo-r5), I get
>>
>> :sudo: can't open /etc
[This is a followup to the whole thread, not any particular posting]
Something interesting just happened to me that I would like to share.
I realized that I have a program called usetool that I must have
installed some time. What is that i thought, so my first try to find
out was to try 'man uset
Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Thanks, read the man page, it was short so it didn't take long. I tried
> this:
>
> uniq -u /home/dale/Desktop/hosts /home/dale/Desktop/hostsort
>
> It doesn't look like it did anything but copy the same thing over.
> There are only 2 lines missi
"Anthony E. Caudel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am in the process of moving to an amd64 system and I anticipate a
> lot of experimentation/tuning with the kernel.
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to set up CVS (or preferably
> Subversion) so that I would be able to back up to any previous
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, did yo note the following warning?
>
> WARN: postinst
> An old version of an installed library was detected on your system.
> In order to avoid breaking packages that link against it, this older version
> is not being removed. In order to make ful
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> After updating lvm2 from 2.02.02 to 2.02.03, the system mount / which
> is on a primary partition but frefus to mount /usr,/var,/home and /tmp.
> On the console I see:
> Setting up the logical volume manager
> Volume group for uuid not found: m6reV.(four times
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:32:26 +0200 Alexander Skwar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
> | *REALLY* require pam?
>
> No, but tcsh does, and openoffice's build system requires tcsh.
Is that
18 matches
Mail list logo
