Hello!
I guess most (all) of the distro's you are talking about use GRUB (or
at least they allow to do it). If that's true, I'm pretty sure you can
happily let them overwrite the GRUB in MBR as many times as they want,
since it's the same (or just probably minor version differences)
bootloader. Ju
On 2024-02-22, Wol wrote:
> On 22/02/2024 21:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I've been reading up on UEFI, and it doesn't seem to be any
>> better. People complain about distro's stomping on each other's files
>> in the ESP partiton and multiple distro's using the same name in the
>> boot slots stored
On 22/02/2024 21:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
I've been reading up on UEFI, and it doesn't seem to be any
better. People complain about distro's stomping on each other's files
in the ESP partiton and multiple distro's using the same name in the
boot slots stored in NVM. And then the boot choice order
On 2024-02-22, Wol wrote:
> On 22/02/2024 19:17, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> However, the choice to install bootloaders in partitions instead of
>> the MBR has been removed from most (all?) of the common installers.
>> This forces me to jump through hoops when installing a new Linux
>> distro:
>
> F
On 22/02/2024 19:17, Grant Edwards wrote:
However, the choice to install bootloaders in partitions instead of
the MBR has been removed from most (all?) of the common installers.
This forces me to jump through hoops when installing a new Linux
distro:
File a bug!
If that's true, it basically bo
For many years, I've used a hard drive on which I have 8-10 Linux
distros installed -- each in a separate (single) partition.
There is also a single swap partition (used by all of the different
Linux installations).
There is also a small partition devoted only to the "master" instance
of Grub tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
